Home Blog Page 4

The Anambra State Homeland Security Law 202 

0
A Collage Picture of the Executive Governor of Anambra State, Prof. Charles Soludo and the Speaker of Anambra state house of Assembly, Rt. Honourable Somtochukwu Udeze
A Collage Picture of the Executive Governor of Anambra State, Prof. Charles Soludo and the Speaker of Anambra state house of Assembly, Rt. Honourable Somtochukwu Udeze

Everything You Need To Know About The New Anambra State Homeland And Security Law, 2025. Yesterday, during the plenary session, the Anambra State House of Assembly led by the Speaker RT. Hon. Somtochukwu Nkem Udeze, PhD passed the Anambra State Homeland Security Bill 2025 into Law. This law gives legislative strength to the efforts of the Executive Governor of Anambra State, Prof. Charles Chukwuma Soludo, CFR in the establishment of a Security Outfit called “AGUNUCHEMBA” in other to restore absolute peace in the State, thereby making Anambra safe from any type of Criminal activity. This law captures all the necessary things needed for effective implementation. Some clauses I want to highlight include; 

Clause 4: The Functions of Agunechemba: 

1. Prevent and detect crimes

2. Make available relevant information on criminals

3. Take necessary measures to ensure that criminals do not operate in any part of the State 

4. Preserve law and order 

5. Protect lives and properties 

6. Arrest criminals and hand them over to police for investigation

7. Give further assistance to the Police where required in the production of witnesses.

Clause 5: Powers of Agunechemba: 

1. The Agunechemba shall have powers to arrest and hand over to the police, any person who commits a crime

2. Patrol the streets and villages at any time of the day

3. Maintain security barricades in appropriate  places

4. Question and handover to the person, any person of questionable character or of suspicious movement 

5. Enter and search any compound into which a questionable person runs into while being pursued 

6. Form special forces or squads to tackle kidnapping, banditry, consumption of illicit drugs, cultism, robbery and any other violent crimes in the State. 

Clause 8: Establishment and Composition: 

(1). There is establishment of a supervisory body to be known as the Anambra State Security Supervisory Committee 

(2). The Anambra State Security Supervisory Committee shall consist of, 

(a) The Governor or any other person designated by him, as the Chairman 

(b) The Commissioner in charge of homeland security, if any, as a member

(c) The Special Adviser to the Governor on Security, if any, as a member 

(d) A representative of the Nigeria Police Force as a member 

(e) A representative of the Department of State Security Service (DSS) as a member 

(f) A representative of the National Security and Civil Defense Corp (NSCDC) as a member

(g) The Chairman of the State House of Assembly Committee on Security as a member 

(h) The Chairman of the State Council of Traditional Rulers or his representative as a member 

(i) A Secretary/Legal Adviser who shall be a State Counsel from the Ministry of Justice 

(j) The Mayors of the Local government areas

(k) Any other member or members as may be appointed by the Governor. 

Clause 13: Duty to make monthly reports and related offences: 

1. As from the  commencement of this law, all president Generals of the town unions recognized by the State Government shall not later than the first week of every month, submit to the Mayor of their respective local government areas and ministry in charge of homeland security or where not existing at the time, any other department or office in charge of security in the State as may be designated by the Governor, a report in any manner as may be prescribed, of;

(a) All criminal or criminally suspicious activities in their communities or by persons from their communities, for the preceding month

(b) Any apprehension or arrest of offenders or suspects made by the Agunechemba establishment under this law, the Nigeria Police or any other law enforcement agency in their communities for the preceding month

(c) The names, addresses, phone numbers, whereabouts and any other necessary particulars of the persons alleged or suspected to have taken part directly or indirectly in the activities in paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of this section or apprehended or arrested as in paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of this section. 

(d) Any person who appears to them to be new and unknown but resides in the community in the preceding month, with the name, address, phone numbers, and any other necessary particulars of such person

(e) Any location whether in the forest or not, suspected to be occupied or used by kidnappers or bandits either as a dwelling place or for the perpetration of crime

(f) Any person who brandishes wealth or engages in lavish or luxurious spending or lifestyle without an ostensible and verified means of livelihood in their communities for the preceding month, with their name, address, phone numbers, and any other necessary particulars of such persons; and 

(g) Their assessment of the Security condition in their communities 

2. Any President General who fails to make the report as required under subsection 1 of this section shall be guilty of misconduct and shall be liable to have his recognition by the State Government withdrawn. 

3. Any President General who parades himself as such after his recognition has been withdrawn by the State Government, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 2 years or a fine of 5 million naira or both. 

Clause 14: Duties of landlords and proprieties of Hotels, lodges and such likes and Related Offences. 

(1.a) As from the commencement of this law, any landlord or owner of property shall before letting out his property, demand and obtain from the proposed tenant, a copy of the valid means of identification of the tenant with his phone number, details of his occupation and where applicable, his place of work and shall submit such means of identification and information to the President General of the town union who shall upon demand, immediately transmit same to the Mayor of the Local Government. 

(b) In any community where there exist(s) estate which makes it difficult for the President General of the community to receive the means of identification and information specified in paragraph A of the sub-section of this section directly from the landlords, the President General shall direct the leadership of the Estate association to collect such means of identification and information from the landlords and transmit to him. 

(2) Any person who lets out his property without obtaining a valid means of identification from the tenant or the information required under subsection 1 of this section, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of one year with an option of fine of five million naira or both. 

(3) The proprietor or operator of any hotel, commercial guest house, inn, lodge, motel, short let apartment or other commercial dwelling place by whatever name called, or hostel shall before accommodating any person, demand and obtain from the guest, a copy of the valid means of identification of the guest and shall as prescribed by the State or Local Government, submit to the appropriate authority the means of identification of the guest and any other information required by the State or Local Government. 

(4) The proprietor or operator of any hotel, commercial guest house, inn, lodge, motel, short let apartment or other commercial dwelling place by whatever name called, shall as from the commencement of this law, install in such facility, a surveillance camera to record the checking in of guest and or the activities taking place within the premises and surroundings and shall as prescribed by the State or Local Government, submit to the appropriate authority the data recorded by the camera. 

(5) Any proprietor or operator of the hotel, commercial guest house, inn, lodge, motel, short let apartment, hostel or other commercial dwelling place by whatever name called, who fails to comply with the provisions of sub-sections 3 and 4 of this section, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of six months with a option of fine of one million naira or both. 

(6) The commissioner in charge of hospitality may withdraw the license or shut down the operations of any hotel, commercial guest house, inn, lodge, motel, short let apartment, hostel or other commercial dwelling place which fails to comply with the provisions of sub-sections 3 and 4 of this section. 

Clause 15: Property Offences in relation to Kidnapping and banditry: 

1. Any person being the owner of any land whether or not in a forest or of any building or a person in control of any such land or building who allows such land or building to be occupied as a camp or settlement or used for purposes of perpetrating or aiding kidnapping, detention of kidnapped victims, demanding or collection of ransoms about kidnapping or any other crime in furtherance of kidnapping or any form of banditry, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 25 years without an option of fine. 

2. Any person not being a member of the Nigeria Police Force, Nigeria Army or other Security agency recognized by the law of the Federal Republic of Nigeria or the laws of Anambra State, who lives or harbours people on any land in the forest in any part of the State except for purposes related to farming or in furtherance of any lawful business, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 25 years without an option of fine. 

3. Any person being the owner of any land in the forest or a person in control of any such land, who allows any person, not being a member of the Police Force, Nigeria Army or other Security agency recognized by the law of the Federal Republic of Nigeria or the laws of Anambra State to live or camp in such forest except for purposes related to farming or in furtherance of any lawful business, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 25 years without an option of fine. 

4. Any person being the owner of any property or a person in control of any such property, who is or becomes aware that such property is used for the commission of any offence and conceals such fact or fails to report same to the police or Agunechemba under this law, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 25 years without an option of fine. 

5. Any person or building used for the commission of any offence under this section shall be forfeited to the State Government 

6. Nothing in sub-section 5 of this section shall preclude the Governor of the State from revoking or acquiring for overriding public purpose, any property in the State, in line with the provisions of the Land Use Act. 

Clause 16: Property Offences in relation to Illicit drugs: 

1. No property in the State shall be used for the manufacture, use or sale of illicit drugs. 

2. Any property used for the manufacture, sale or use of illicit drugs in the state shall be forfeited to the State Government. 

Clause 17: Case Files to be submitted to the Attorney general. 

In furtherance of the powers granted to the Attorney General of the States under section 211 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), section 149 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Anambra State 2023 and section 31 of the Police Act 2020. 

1. The files of all cases concerning or related to kidnapping under investigation by the police shall after investigation, subject to the direction of the Attorney General, be immediately forwarded to the Attorney General for review or advice. 

2. Where the investigation is not concluded within 15 days from the date of the arrest or the date the report is made whichever is earlier, the case file shall be duplicated and submitted to the Attorney General immediately upon the expiration of the said period of 15 days for his direction, review or advice. 

Clause 18: Offences on the use of Supernatural powers. 

1. Any person who under the practice of “ Okeite” or “Eze Nwanyi” or under any other guise, administers any substance or charm on or for any other person for the purpose of the commission of any offence or for the purpose of the accumulation of wealth by supernatural means other than by any known lawful means of livelihood or who publicly propagates the accumulation of such wealth other than by any known lawful means of livelihood, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 6 years with an option of fine of 20 million naira or both. 

2. Any person who performs any sacrifice or dumps on any road or thrown into any water body in the state, any charms, substance or items of sacrifice in fragrance of the commission of any offence under subsection 1 of this section, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 6 years with an option of fine of 20 million Naira or both. 

3. Any person who misleads the public by purporting to wield any Supernatural powers which he is found not to possess or who obtains any reward from any person in furtherance thereof, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 6 years with an option of fine of 20 million naira or both. 

4. For the purpose of ascertaining whether or not a person possesses the natural powers under subsection 3 of this section, any such person suspected of misleading the public under subsection 3 of this section shall at the stage of investigation, be subjected to proof that he possesses such powers. 

5. An investigation made by the police in respect of any offence under this section shall be forwarded to the Attorney General of the State for review and advice before the prosecution of any person suspected of having committed the offence.

Clause 19: Offences involving the use of religious place

1. Any person who uses any religious place for the commission or to aid the commission of any crime, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 6 years with an option of a fine of 20 million Naira or both. 

2. Any religious place suspected of being used to commit or aid the commission of any crime may be sealed by the order of the Governor pending the conclusion of the investigation. 

3. If after the conclusion of the investigation, there exists a prime facie case of the commission or aiding the commission of any crime in such place, any person found culpable shall be charged to court. 

4. Where a person is charged to court under this section, the property or place involved shall be sealed, except unsealed by the order of the Governor, and remain sealed until the determination of the charge or unless otherwise ordered by the court. 

Clause 20: Offences involving human parts: 

Any person who performs or requires of any person the performance of any rituals involving human parts commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of 25 years without an option of fine. 

From these clauses highlighted, you can see that this law encompasses all. We shall continue to bring you more details of this law. 

✍️ Rt Hon. Ejike Okechukwu (Ogbuefinukoefi), for Anambra State House of Assembly Committee on Media and Publicity

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Nigeria needs more Dele Farotimis

1
Lawyer and Human Right Activist, Dele Farotimi
Lawyer and Human Right Activist, Dele Farotimi

Last week’s arrest of good-governance activist and lawyer, Mr Dele Farotimi, in Lagos by police from Ekiti State got many Nigerians angry for many reasons. Farotimi was arrested based on the petition by Chief Afe Babalola, SAN, that Farotimi defamed him in his book, Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System. The uproar was not because Farotimi was asked to account for his allegation about Babalola. Most people agree that people have a right not to be defamed and that those who feel their rights have been breached have a right to sue. But the primary source of worry was the resort to the usual “big man syndrome” in Nigeria, where rich and influential people can get the police to arrest and detain people ad infinitum, even over civil or bailable offences. That actually gives credence to the title of Farotimi’s book, because justice typically starts with a report to the police.

This scenario played out recently when Afrobeats musician Burna Boy got another musician, Speed Darlington, arrested and detained in October. It took Darlington’s mother doing a video, crying and kneeling to beg Burna Boy to release her son because he was an only son, for Burna Boy to get him released. Similarly, in September last year, the President and CEO of Erisco Foods Limited, Chief Eric Umeofia, got Mrs Chioma Okoli arrested because of a social media post she made about one of the products she used. Again, in April last year, the Lagos State Government got a community leader, Chief Frederick Nwajagu, Eze Ndigbo of Ajao Estate, Lagos, arrested for saying that based on the threats Igbo people were receiving in Lagos State regarding the elections, they might invite the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra to come and protect them. Till today (a year and eight months), Nwajagu is still in detention, even though his comment did not cause any violence, but the same Lagos State cleverly turned a blind eye to clear threats made by MC Oluomo (Musiliu Akinsanya) and others, which resulted in violence and deaths in Lagos during the 2023 elections.

Also, this year, the police got crossdresser Bobrisky (Idris Okuneye) arrested, charged and jailed for spraying naira notes at a party but did not show the same passion in the case of a nightclub owner, Cubana Chief Priest (Pascal Okechukwu), on a similar case of spraying naira notes at an event. Many other people, including government officials, have been spraying naira notes before and after Bobrisky was jailed without any repercussion. It made many conclude that Bobrisky was not arrested and jailed for spraying naira notes but because of his cross-dressing and links to the queer community. What Nigeria has proved over and over again is that Lady Justice is not blind. Nigeria does not even pretend about it. Lady Justice has her eyes wide open and can choose who to punish and who not to spare. This choice is dependent upon things like the financial muscle of those involved in the case, social status, ethnicity, religion, political leaning, age, gender, anti-corruption/human rights stand, nuisance value, etc.

The Nigerian system seeks out those who are vocal against injustice and corruption or who have a seemingly clean record and finds something to pin on them to jail them and silence them. Because of the perverted justice system Nigeria operates, the commonest expressions people use during a disagreement are: “Do you know who I am?” or “I will teach you a lesson.” These are expressions you will never hear in any country with a sane justice system. A relative of mine in the United States said he once told a woman, “I will deal with you”, during a quarrel. While the woman was about to call the police, he ran towards her, pleading that he didn’t mean it, that it was just a common saying Nigerians use during disagreements. The lady eventually calmed down and forgave him based on some extenuating circumstances. If not for that, the police would have arrived within a few minutes, arrested him and charged him with a threat to life. If he was not sentenced, he would have a police record that if anything should happen to that woman, he would be held liable. Imagine someone else stabbing the woman or even killing her.

Similarly, as a political leader, military officer, police officer, judicial officer, celebrity, business leader, etc., in such countries, you dare not peddle or flaunt your position while having any misunderstanding with anybody. Nobody cares who you are. Nobody wants to know. In fact, you are disadvantaged the moment you are a public figure and get into a misunderstanding with someone of lower social status. If you use your position to threaten, harass or discriminate against another, you will face disciplinary measures, which may include a sack. That is how developed countries that have the same democracy Nigeria flaunts react to issues like this. They have fought for decades to enthrone equality. It does not mean that there won’t be people who still oppress others based on their positions, but the country ensures that the moment such a case is made public, there is swift action to prosecute whoever the offender is, to reiterate that all human beings are equal before the law.

That is the type of society people like Farotimi have been fighting to enthrone in Nigeria. Irrepressible human rights lawyer, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, SAN, was the arrowhead of this movement all through the 1980s, ‘90s, and the first decade of the 21st century. By the time he died in 2009, that dream had not been realised. In reality, there was no sign that it was about to be achieved. The only key recorded achievement (if it can be called an achievement) is that in the last 25 years, the military has not seized power, unlike in the past when no civilian tenure had lasted for up to six years. But the civilian beneficiaries of these 25 years of uninterrupted democracy have not shown any sign that they want to establish good governance, respect for human rights, respect for the rule of law, financial transparency, rectitude, service instead of rulership, etc.

For many years now, Farotimi has been disgusted with the type of governance taking place in Nigeria and the seeming inaction of the followers, who are the victims of this misgovernance. For example, in a Facebook post on December 7, 2019, Farotimi said: “Nothing is as frustrating as being a lawyer in a lawless society.”

On November 28, 2018, he posted: “Our parents looked, mostly unseeing; Fela looked and laughed in pain; my generation looks and is more, at best, lamenting impotently, even as our children’s very future is imperiledrilled, and our lifetime rendered intolerable… (he added the Nigerian flag).” On that same day, he had earlier posted: “Somebody has to keep the watch, even in a nation of somnambulists, and history must be recorded, even in the land of the amnesiacs. Aluta Continua … (He added the Nigerian flag and a crying emoji with tongue out).” Farotimi can live abroad, but he prefers to be in Nigeria. Despite his regular biting criticism of Nigerian leaders on TV programs and social media posts, he still took the risk to return to Nigeria, knowing how vindictive the ruling class can be. But anyone following his interventions on Nigerian issues knows he no longer fears for his safety. He has devoted his life to a new Nigeria and does not care what he suffers in pursuing that.

What Babalola did was to make Farotimi more popular and unconsciously crown him the leader of the movement for a new Nigeria. His arrest has also made the book in question very popular, with many people buying and reading it. Babalola has the right to seek redress regarding his name. But whatever the court decides, Farotimi has been presented with an opportunity to prove his mettle as a fighter for good governance. Judged by his antecedents, it is obvious that he is ready for that.

By Azuka Onwuka, 10th December, 2024

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

The Truth Will Always Stand!

0
In 1916, a beautifully crafted clay pot from the Ikwerre people was displayed at the Pitt Rivers Museum in the UK. It was celebrated as part of the rich cultural heritage of the Ikwerre, a proud Igbo-speaking community.
In 1916, a beautifully crafted clay pot from the Ikwerre people was displayed at the Pitt Rivers Museum in the UK. It was celebrated as part of the rich cultural heritage of the Ikwerre, a proud Igbo-speaking community.

Having closely followed the recent trends concerning the Ndigbo of Rivers State identity, it is important to clarify some key points regarding the ethnic background of individuals such as the President General of Ohaneze Ndigbo Worldwide, Senator Mbata, and Rtd. IGP Mike Okiro. Contrary to common belief, Okiro is not a native Ikwerre but rather hails from the Ogba ethnic group in Egbema, near Omoku, within Rivers State. Meanwhile, Senator Mbata is an Ikwerre man who was duly elected as the President General of Ohaneze Worldwide, as it is the turn of the Igbos of Rivers State to produce the President General of Ohaneze Ndigbo Worldwide.

It is worth noting that the Ogba and Ndoni people in Rivers State share closer ethnic ties with mainstream Igbos than the Ikwerres and Etches. Tribal and ethnic identity have historically been significant factors leading to conflicts, prompting the Igbos of Rivers State to cautiously navigate issues of identity without inciting irredentism. Conversely, those Igbos from the South Eastern States of Nigeria who prefer to maintain their identity due to differing political affiliations risk being labelled as isolationists. Resolving any ambiguity surrounding the ethnic identity of the Ikwerres and Etches is crucial, as they are recognized as authentic Igboid sub-groups. For instance, individuals of Russian, Ukrainian, Belorussian, Czech, Slovak, Serbian, Bulgarian, Croatian, Polish, Slovene and other Slavic descent cannot deny their inherent Slavic heritage.

Nigerian politicians often exploit minor dialectical differences post-civil war, yet they cannot fundamentally alter the cultural fabric of ethnic groups like Ndigbo. The discussion surrounding ethnicity and nationhood in the context of self-determination provides insight into how politicians attempt to shape narratives. Despite the impact of the civil war on the Igbo community in Nigeria, particularly in Rivers State, it is understandable why some Rivers State Igbo individuals distance themselves from their Igbo identity. I believe that in resolving identity dilemmas, one’s opinion should be respected, allowing individuals to choose their affiliations without external imposition.

Having said that, let’s now delve into the Ikwerre People and why they are Igbos and always will be Igbo. In 1916, a beautifully crafted clay pot from the Ikwerre people was displayed at the Pitt Rivers Museum in the UK. It was celebrated as part of the rich cultural heritage of the Ikwerre, a proud Igbo-speaking community. That pot, believed to have originated from Igwurita (Igrita) in present-day Rivers State, serves as a reminder of the deep history and identity of the Ikwerre people within the Igbo nation. Yet, over time, some Ikwerre people have distanced themselves from their Igbo roots, often claiming they are not Igbo. While they are entitled to their opinions, the facts remain unchanged. Being Igbo is not something that can be denied or undone—it is in the language we speak, the culture we practice, and the history we share. Denying these connections is like a person insisting they are not human. Such a claim does not change the reality of who they are.

Who Are the Igbo? The Igbo nation is not defined by geography or politics but by shared language, traditions, and ancestry. Every Igbo subgroup has its dialect—Ngwa, Nsukka, Awka, Enuani, etc and yes, Ikwerre. These dialects may vary, but they are all interconnected, with over 80% mutual intelligibility among Igbo speakers. Central Igbo was created for ease of communication, but the real essence of Igbo lies in these local dialects, including Ikwerre. The Ikwerre people live and breathe Igbo culture. Their names are Igbo, their traditional foods are Igbo, their marriage customs are Igbo, and their kings are called “Eze,” a distinctly Igbo title. To separate Ikwerre from the Igbo is to separate a branch from its tree—an impossible task.

Why the Denial? The roots of this denial lie in history, particularly during the Biafran War (1967–1970). During that turbulent time, efforts were made to divide the Igbo people, exploiting political and social differences to weaken the unity of the region. These tactics left scars, and some of the divisions persist to this day. However, historical events cannot rewrite the truth. The Ikwerre, like every other Igbo subgroup, are an essential part of the Igbo nation. The population of the Igbo people, estimated at nearly 80 million, is made up of many subgroups like the Ngwa, Nri, and Ikwerre. Each subgroup has its sociocultural organization—such as Ogbakor Ikwerre for the Ikwerre people—but all fall under the umbrella of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, the apex body that represents the Igbo globally.

The Truth Will Always Stand! For those who claim the Ikwerre are not Igbo, the truth is simple: you cannot change what you are. A son may disown his father, but that does not erase their blood ties. The Ikwerre people are Igbo because that is their heritage, their language, and their culture. No amount of denial can change that. The Ikwerre are a vital part of the Igbo story—a story of resilience, unity, and greatness. Instead of clinging to divisions created by history, it is time to embrace our shared identity and celebrate what makes us one. The Ikwerre are Igbo, not because someone is forcing them to be, but because that is who they are. It is in their blood, their history, and their culture. And just as you cannot separate a river from its source, you cannot separate the Ikwerre from the Igbo nation. This is how God made it, and this is how it will always be. 

NzeIkayMedia ✍🏽

Disclaimer

The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

South Korea’s Worst AirDisaster – A Devastating Plane Crash That Claimed 179 Lives.

0
South Korea’s Worst AirDisaster - A Devastating Plane Crash That Claimed 179 Lives.
South Korea’s Worst AirDisaster - A Devastating Plane Crash That Claimed 179 Lives.

In a heartbreaking incident that has left the nation in mourning, South Korea has experienced its worst air disaster on record. A Jeju Air flight, which was arriving from Bangkok, Thailand, tragically crashed at Hwan International Airport on Sunday morning at approximately 9:03 a.m. local time. This devastating event resulted in the loss of 179 lives, with only two crew members surviving. The crash unfolded rapidly after Air Traffic Control granted the flight clearance to land at around 8:54 a.m. Just minutes later, warnings were issued as one of the pilots reported hitting a bird shortly before attempting to land. To regain control and ensure safety, the pilot made a distress call and requested permission to approach from an alternate direction.

Despite executing a midair U-turn and managing to reach the runway, the landing was far from successful. The aircraft touched down about halfway along the runway—approximately 2.8 kilometres long—without deploying its landing gear or wing flaps. Consequently, it skidded for around 1,600 meters before crashing into a concrete wall where it erupted into flames. Among those on board were 175 passengers and six crew members; tragically, only two crew members seated near the tail section survived this horrific event. The aftermath has been devastating for families who are now grappling with their losses while waiting for news about their loved ones’ remains.

As South Korea reels from this tragedy, national mourning has been declared for seven days with memorials set up across various locations in remembrance of those who perished. New Year’s Day celebrations have also been muted as communities come together in grief and reflection. Anger is palpable among victims’ families as they await answers regarding why emergency crews are still identifying bodies amidst wreckage recovery efforts—a process that highlights concerns over airport safety protocols following such catastrophic events.

Experts have raised questions about why there was a concrete structure so close to the runway; located just 250 meters away from where planes land could potentially have contributed to further casualties during this incident if it had not been there at all. Moreover, scrutiny is being directed toward Jeju Air’s operational practices leading up to this crash—the aircraft had completed numerous flights within just two days prior—raising alarms over possible excessive use that could have impacted performance or maintenance checks prior to takeoff. The investigation is ongoing with both black boxes recovered; however, damage sustained by one of them may delay obtaining crucial information regarding what went wrong during flight operations leading up to this disaster—a process expected to take weeks or even months depending on the severity levels observed within data recordings retrieved thus far.

This tragic event marks another dark chapter in South Korean aviation history reminiscent of past disasters like Korean Air’s crash in Guam back in 1997 which claimed nearly double those lives lost recently, thereby prompting significant reforms aimed towards improving air travel safety standards across regions in South Korea. Sunday’s calamity raises serious doubts over these already-taken measures surrounding air travel reliability in South Korea. 

Boeing – A Year of Turbulence for the Aerospace Giant

The recent South Korean air disaster has once again thrust Boeing into the spotlight, and not for reasons that the aerospace giant would prefer. This year has been particularly challenging for Boeing, as scrutiny over the safety of its aircraft intensifies. The latest incident involving a Boeing 737-800 jet adds to a growing list of concerns surrounding the company. 2024 began with a shocking event when an Arafat Airlines flight experienced a mid-air emergency on January 5th. During this flight, a door unexpectedly blew out, causing chaos as oxygen was rapidly sucked from the cabin. Passengers were at risk, with one teenager even losing his shirt in the commotion. Fortunately, no serious injuries were reported; however, this incident raised alarm bells and placed Boeing under intense scrutiny.

Fast forward to recent events in South Korea—two incidents within just two days have further eroded public trust in Boeing’s aircraft. The first incident involved an emergency landing where the plane touched down without its landing gear deployed. Questions loom over whether this was due to human error or potential mechanical failure on the part of the aircraft itself. Investigations will take time to conclude but until then, all eyes are on Boeing. The second incident occurred shortly after: another Jeju Air 737 800 faced similar landing gear issues but managed to return safely after detecting problems shortly after takeoff. While today’s outcome was positive compared to yesterday’s crash, it highlights ongoing concerns about mechanical defects associated with these models.

Public confidence is wavering; many passengers are now checking their flights for any indication that they might be flying on a Boeing jet—and some are opting out entirely if they find themselves booked on one! This shift is indicative of how deeply affected people feel about their safety when flying. Boeing’s reputation has taken significant hits over recent years due to high-profile crashes and manufacturing defects—the most notorious being those involving the 737 MAX in 2018 and 2019 which led to extensive investigations revealing cost-cutting measures that compromised safety standards. As we delve deeper into 2024, things appear grim for Boeing; share prices have plummeted by around 32% this year alone amid mounting pressure from both consumers and investors alike following these incidents and previous labour strikes that lasted seven weeks until last month. It’s clear that change is needed at Boeing—a return to its roots focusing on innovation rather than cutting corners could help restore faith among flyers worldwide. As consumers continue choosing alternatives or expressing hesitance towards flying with them again while investors push share prices downward—Boeing may soon realize it must adapt or face dire consequences.

Ultimately, ensuring global air safety should be paramount—not only for those who fly but also as an essential principle guiding aviation companies like Boeing back toward excellence in engineering and customer trust. 

NzeIkayMedia ✍️

Disclaimer: 

The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Response to the dissolved NIDOE CEC’s recent Press Statement: CEC stands Dissolved

1
Alhaji Issa Abdullahi (Chairman) and Dr. Onyebuchi Egbuchunam (General Secretary)
Alhaji Issa Abdullahi (Chairman) and Dr. Onyebuchi Egbuchunam (General Secretary)

Dear Members of the Press and Nigerian Community in Europe, 

We, the legally constituted Caretaker Committee of the Nigerians in Diaspora Organization Europe(NIDOE), are issuing this press release to clarify the misrepresentations contained in the press statement dated October 29, 2024, issued by the dissolved Central Executive Council (CEC). The inaccurate information presented in the dissolved CEC’s press release does not represent the legal grounds, democratic processes, and member-driven initiatives that resulted in the lawful dissolution of both the CEC and the Electoral Committee (EC) at an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of NIDOE held on October 26, 2024. 

1. Legality of the EGM and Authority of Members to Convene: 

The EGM held on October 26 was convened in full compliance with the UK Companies Act 2006 and the NIDOE Constitution, underscoring the democratic and legal rights of members to address organizational issues through an assembly. According to Section 303 of the UK Companies Act 2006, members holding the requisite voting rights are entitled to requisition a meeting if the existing leadership fails to address significant concerns. The CEC’s neglect to convene a meeting following the membership meeting requisition to discuss those substantial concerns constituted a breach of Section 304, providing the legal basis for members to organize and hold an EGM under Section 305 of the UK Companies Act 2006. 

Furthermore, the dissolved CEC’s claims that the EGM is “unconstitutional” lack foundation. Articles 56 and 57 of the NIDOE Constitution, along with Article 12 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (protecting members’ rights to freely associate and make democratic decisions), reinforce the legitimacy of the EGM as a platform for members to exercise their governance rights. 

2. Valid Dissolution of the CEC and EC by Members Vote:

At the EGM, more than 95% of attendees—consisting of over 170 vetted and registered NIDOE members from chapters across Europe—voted to pass a vote of no confidence on both the CEC led by Dr. Bashir Obasekola and the EC led by Mr. Adesina Ayodele, and for the immediate dissolution of both councils. The grounds for dissolution stem from alleged mismanagement, breaches of the NIDOE Constitution, and concerns over lack of financial accountability, all of which required immediate action to preserve NIDOE’s integrity. The EGM’s resolutions, including the establishment of a seven-member Caretaker Committee, were conducted transparently and with the full endorsement of a significant majority of NIDOE members, further legitimizing the decisions taken.

3. Appointment and Authority of the Caretaker Committee:

Following the dissolution of the CEC and EC, the EGM unanimously approved a Caretaker Committee to oversee the operations of NIDOE. This committee’s mandate includes:

• Managing NIDOE’s daily operations

• Overseeing a transparent electoral process within twelve months

• Restoring membership trust through transparent governance

The Caretaker Committee is legally empowered by both the EGM resolution and Articles 56 and 57 of the NIDOE Constitution to act in these capacities. This Committee will coordinate all organizational functions, ensuring alignment with NIDOE’s core values and compliance with relevant laws, including the UK Companies Act 2006.

4. Countering Misleading Claims on Chapter and Candidate Nominations

The dissolved CEC’s claim of “unconstitutional” chapter conduct and improper candidate nominations represents a distortion of facts. The dissolved CEC’s approach towards UK-South (UKS) chapter nominees sought to undermine Chapter autonomy and to control chapter-based decisions, invariably undermining the NIDOE Constitution’s principles of chapter-level governance. Additionally, the dissolved CEC and EC’s disregard for fair election practices and representation prompted NIDOE members to rightfully take corrective action through the EGM.

5. Consequences of Non-Compliance by the Dissolved CEC and EC:

Under the UK Companies Act, any continued obstruction by the dissolved CEC and EC to transfer NIDOE assets, documents, and authority to the Caretaker Committee will lead to appropriate course of action being taken against them. These may include but not limited to legal actions. We hope this alongside the potential consequences will be avoided, as we look forward to their full cooperation in the transfer of all NIDO Europe assets and documents in their possession to the lawfully constituted Caretaker Committee.

6. Call for Unity and Compliance:

The Caretaker Committee was established to uphold NIDOE’s values, integrity, and mission by restoring transparency and enabling democratic representation. We call upon all members, chapters, and stakeholders to support this transitional phase, designed solely to realign NIDOE with its foundational goals. We urge Dr. Bashir Obasekola and all former CEC and EC members to respect the democratic will of NIDOE members, as any continued non-compliance will compel the Committee to seek appropriate recourse.

We trust that all well-meaning members of the Nigerian diaspora in Europe will see through these divisive tactics and work collaboratively with the Caretaker Committee for a unified, transparent, and effective NIDOE.

Thank you for your attention and commitment to upholding NIDOE’s democratic principles.

Signed by: 

Alhaji Issa Abdullahi (Chairman) and Dr. Onyebuchi Egbuchunam 
(General Secretary) 

For and on behalf of the NIDOE Caretaker Committee. 

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Welcome to BRICS+: The Economic Power of a Multi-polar World 

4
Some BRICS leaders; Presidents of China, Russia and Prime Minister of India Modi discussing at the Summit in Russia 2024.
Some BRICS leaders; Presidents of China, Russia and Prime Minister of India Modi discussing at the Summit in Russia 2024.

The developing world arrived in Kazan, the capital of the Republic of Tatarstan, driven by economic transformation proposals backed by the numerical strength of participants to portray their collective weight of influence to boost de-dollarization and a new global financial payment system, design a new mechanism for a long-term economic integration and complex architecture. For much of its significant collective activities, these past several years, BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) has been viewed and described from perspectives of supporting the economic development in the Global South, Southeast Asia and Africa. 

Unpacking some of the official statements and positions over proposals awaiting discussions at the summit indicates the brightness of a multipolar world. These past 30 years Russia is steadily building its market economy and its related institutions. Transitioning to a market economy is not easy, while China, India and many potential BRICS members have arguable variations in political, economic and cultural capabilities. Notwithstanding some level of disagreements and divergencies of ideas, China and Russia have consistently asked their partners to create an alternative to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to counter political pressure from Western nations ahead of the BRICS summit this late October. 

Arguably Western countries tightly control the global financial system, and the group, which represents 37% of the global economy, therefore it beholds on BRICS to create an alternative. Some BRICS experts have underlined in reports that the IMF and the World Bank are unsuccessfully performing their roles. Top BRICS finance and central bank officials, a few weeks before the summit meeting, acknowledged the urgent necessity to form new conditions or even new institutions, similar to the Bretton Woods institutions, but within the framework of the community, within the framework of BRICS+. For instance, Russia had its forex reserves in dollars and euros frozen and its financial system was heavily hit by sanctions by the West after it invaded Ukraine in February 2022. As expected, Russia has been cut off from international capital markets. In addition, Russia has also experienced delays in international transactions with its trading partners, including BRICS member countries, as banks in these countries fear punitive actions from Western regulators. 

Beyond that the New Development Bank proposed setting up a joint investment platform which will use a new digital form of transactions among members. That has been the critical reason why Central Bank officials and Finance Ministers of BRICS+ are pushing to implement stringent measures including the BRICS Bridge payments system, which would link member countries’ financial systems, but progress has been slow. As already known, the only financial institution the BRICS countries have established so far is the New Development Bank, created in 2015 to finance infrastructure and sustainable development projects in BRICS members and other emerging economies. 

Mihaela Papa, director of research and principal research scientist at the Center for International Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and co-author of the 2022 book: “Can BRICS De-dollarize the Global Financial System?” has argued that BRICS+ needs to strategically innovate to show practical influence in their operations. “With BRICS doubling its membership in 2024, new members are expected to support existing BRICS agendas,” she said in a critical written interview with Bloomberg News. “A key question is whether they can innovate together.” The core principles of BRICS have resonated with the Global South. The BRICS ‘brand’ is linked to positive economic prospects and growth, as well as the ambition to diversify global leadership, promote development, and modernize multilateral institutions. BRICS has actively engaged Global South countries through outreach efforts, emphasizing non-ideological and mutually beneficial economic cooperation. 

BRICS’ risk management credentials have grown since early 2022. Countries in the Global South have observed the freezing of Russia’s reserves while facing the consequences of a stronger US dollar. This led many to question their heavy reliance on the dollar, which BRICS seeks to address. States applying to join BRICS cite reasons like strengthening South-South trade and financial cooperation, supporting multilateralism, and enhancing their global role. While BRICS members have differing views on major geopolitical conflicts, their solidarity and cultivation of non-Western narratives increase the association’s hedging value. 

Therefore, it does not matter whether BRICS or the unification of China, India, Russia, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Iran and Turkey, will be more viable or not. The main thing is that the process of searching for new models by the states dissatisfied with the United States policy has started, which means the end of the dominance of the United States in all spheres of international relations. At some point, the West, headed by the United States, will have to negotiate new models of international economic and other relations, based on new international treaties that ensure equality of all states. 

A multi-year study at Tufts University published in July 2023, for instance, found that the “BRICS countries connect around common development interests and quest for a multipolar world order in which no single power dominates. Yet BRICS consolidation has turned the association into a potent negotiation force that now challenges Washington’s geopolitical and economic goals.” Moreover, de-dollarization would undermine the effectiveness of US sanctions, relying on the SWIFT system, as BRICS seeks alternative financial systems, potentially making SWIFT obsolete. As for a common BRICS currency, it is currently not under priority consideration. The time has not come yet. The introduction of BRICS currency has to be treated with uttermost caution, without any haste, as the members’ economies by their structure, and effectiveness, should be approximately equal, or would have the same problems, even more than the problems that arose in the European Union, when a common currency was introduced for those countries, whose economic levels were comparable. 

Western analysts and experts have highlighted potential divisions and weaknesses in the association, including significant economic instabilities, and disagreements among the members over security reforms and over territorial issues, especially between China and India. There are existing conflicts between Egypt and Ethiopia too. As many countries join BRICS, as also fresh contradictions will arise within the association in future. Despite their rivalries, China and India have been deepening their cooperation through BRICS. The demand for BRICS membership is high, and scepticism about its ideological direction and benefits is also increasing. Argentina has withdrawn, Saudi Arabia is undecided, Indonesia is not ready, and Mexico is uninterested. 

After the Soviet’s collapse in 1991, Russia abandoned Africa paving the pathways for China’s entry. For the past three decades, China has exerted its economic power in the continent, as part of its remote dream to become global economic power. Against this backdrop, the BRICS platform is important to China to strengthen its economic power. China has seemingly capitalized on Russia’s economic weaknesses in former Soviet republics, passionately consolidating its economic tentacles and beyond that one should be really critical to examine how China is transiting strategically into Europe. Its primary goal is to expand economic influence and access to European markets.  As the situation stands, Russia and the European Union are at logger-head due to a ‘special military operation’ in neighbouring Ukraine. 

Obviously, with prospects of strengthening the association, Russia stands to gain significantly, especially in this time of shifting geopolitical situation. At the group’s 10th parliamentary forum in July 2024, Putin particularly noted that “openness, fairness and equality are the principles that unite BRICS countries.” In this sense, interaction with the countries in the regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America will undoubtedly bolster Russia’s global political status and overcome restrictions or sanctions. Southeast Asian and African countries view BRICS as a significant player in the evolving global landscape. They see it as an opportunity to strengthen their economic positions, diversify partnerships and assert their interest on the world stage. The growing interest from Southeast Asia and Africa in joining BRICS reflects a broader desire for a multipolar world where emerging economies can collaborate more effectively on the world stage. 

The principal feature, especially in official statements and in media reports, it should not be perceived as an anti-Western association. It’s simply non-Western, with a focus on attaining the common goal of sustainable development and prosperity for members based on the multilateral Global South. Therefore, supporting business activity and enterprise is considered a priority for leaders of all BRICS countries. 

As always with much fortitude, Russia is consistently convincing China and India to support building a common consensus to enlarge BRICS, which seeks to shape a multipolar global order in place of the fading era of Western dominance. Founded 15 years ago by Brazil, Russia, India and China as BRIC, the group, with the addition of South Africa in 2011, became BRICS. And with this year’s entry of five additional countries, it has become BRICS-plus, accounting for nearly half the world’s population and 40 percent of global trade. Reiterating here that BRICS, originally comprising Brazil, Russia, India, and China, has expanded to include South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia. 

– By Professor Maurice Okoli, Email: markolconsult@gmail.com

Professor Maurice Okoli is a fellow at the Institute for African Studies and the Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences. He is also a fellow at the North-Eastern Federal University of Russia. He is an expert at the Roscongress Foundation and the Valdai Discussion Club. As an academic researcher and economist with a keen interest in current geopolitical changes and the emerging world order, Prof. Maurice Okoli frequently contributes articles for publication in reputable media portals on different aspects of the interconnection between developing and developed countries, particularly in Asia, Africa, and Europe.

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Mayday! Mayday! Our Country Is In Trouble, So Much Trouble That Thinkers And Fixers Are Needed Urgently III.

2
Prof Chris Mustapha Nwaokobia Jnr., Convener COUNTRYFIRST MOVEMENT. A Good Governance Advocacy Group.
Prof Chris Mustapha Nwaokobia Jnr., Convener COUNTRYFIRST MOVEMENT. A Good Governance Advocacy Group.

What Nigeria Is Not At 64.

It is said that Nigeria is 64 today, and that’s what we have on Paper. But are we truly 64? Are we even the reverse, 46? I don’t think so, Nigeria wobbles, falters and stutters like a 6, and a 4-year-old Child. Certainly not like 64.

Nigeria is NOT a Nation BUT a Rogue State superintended over by Rogues. Rogue Partisans and Rogue Political Operators. Rogue Ethnic Paladins. Rogue Clergy (Rogue Imams, Rogue Pastors and Rogue Traditional Worshippers). Rogue Activists and Cashtivists. Rogue Generals and Rogue Military Operators. Rogue Police. Rogue Electoral Umpires. Rogue INEC. Rogue Big Businesses. And a Rogue Citizenry. Our Country bleeds for lack of the requisite manure necessary to grow patriotism and patriots. Mayday!

At 64, Nigeria is NOT a Country that regards the Truth. State Operators pride in their ability to deceive. Falsehood and tommyrot are considered priceless to State Propaganda. The President lies, the Vice President lies, the Senate President and the Deputy Senate President swim in the sea of falsehood, and so is the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker, they are proud Yes-men rubber-stamping everything the Executive desires. The Judiciary is a place of Justice for Hire or Justice for the Highest Bidder with our Judiciary adjudged the most corrupt institution in today’s Nigeria. Are the sub-national governments different? Your guess is as good as mine.

Nigeria has no place for REALITY, no room for empirical thinking, no knack for expertise, no commitment to due process, no love for order, no desire to build a reliable future for posterity, and no dedication to duty. We are fans of debauchery, of platitudes and of deceit. We are easily dribbled and deceived. At 64 the President just read a Nationwide Broadcast full of platitudes and promises without empiricals. How can an economy grow where the Cost of Energy, of Power, and of funds are astronomical? How can an economy survive when the cost of doing business is killing businesses? How can an economy and a nation grow when inflation is on a steady rise when the value of the currency is unsteady, unpredictable and glaringly on a jingle-over? Mayday!

Nigeria is NOT yet on the path to recovery, be not deceived. And that is why this Mayday Call at 64 is rife, trite and recondite. How can a Country that has no reliable statistics proudly say that things are getting better? A nation that continues to talk about the removal of fuel subsidies without a near exact figure of the millions of litres of Fuel/PMS it consumes daily. On what statistics was this nation paying fuel subsidies to rogues and big businesses? Until people are called to refund the monies so stolen. Until the opaqueness of the operations of the NNPC LTD is put to an end, all those who have headed the Corporation since 1999 called to account for the over 1.5 billion Dollars spent on the endless Turnaround Maintenance of our ‘Scrap’ Refineries. Until those who govern put primacy on the safety of lives and property, on growing national infrastructure, on education, on true fiscal federalism, on devolution of power, and on a holistic overhaul of the dysfunctional enterprise called Nigeria, our search for redemption would amount to the proverbial Wait For Godot. Mayday!

Did you hear the lie about winning the War on Insecurity? Nigerians clearly feel more unsafe anywhere and everywhere in Nigeria today than before. The past 9 years have seen the democratization and liberalization of terror. Non-state Actors are in charge, holding command over spaces, and places and taxing Farmers before allowing them access to their farmlands whereas the Commander-In-Chief busies the country with promises and platitudes. Whereas Spokespersons of Mr President engage in ethnic baiting and baying, fiercely deepening our fault lines and deviously dividing the Country even more. Mayday!

The democratic space is under siege, the greatest siege since 1999. The present watch and system hails State Capture. Supports and sides with electoral larceny and corruption. Superintends over flawed polls and elections. Stifles the right to dissent. Harasses and harangues Protesters, Journalists and Whistleblowers. Hails criminals and looters as BIG MEN, lampoons critics, and calls whistleblowers BLACKMAILERS. How degenerate have we become? Mayday!

The present crop of leaders or looters are ensconced by profligacy, waste, and wanderlust, they are men and women of very poor leadership credentials. They spend money on everything that is unserious and unnecessary, new Official Cars, new Official Houses/Residence, new Presidential jets etc without effectual, efficient and effective investment in the things that matter. How can an economy grow where the government majors in profligacy, waste and wanderlust? Mayday!

Hope according to the Sage Obafemi Awolowo is the last milk in the human breast. Yes, we are a Country of very religious men and women, we have men and women of ‘God’ whose merchandise is faith and hope, and the light in our space is perennially dimmed by those who swallow the deceit, the demagoguery and the shenanigans of political operators. Of what use will a 30-Day Youth Concert be, when the whimsical dialogue of the deaf remains the predilection of the State when the young people are talked down at and denigrated when young people who expressed their rights to protest ditto the EndSars and recently the EndBadGovernance Protestation are still in Prison and Police Cells across the Country. Who is gaslighting who? Who is deceiving who? Mayday!

I shall continue with this series hopefully leadership will think and do right. Yes, the sequel is loaded. In the interim, let it be known beyond the obfuscating blindfolds of politics and politricks that at 64 Nigeria is NOT yet a Nation; that at 64 Nigeria is more divided than it was some 30, 40 years ago; that at 64 Nigeria is but a theatre of absurdities where perfidy, mendacity and debauchery is the Act of State; that at 64 the political ideology of political operators is yet ‘me, myself and I’; at 64 Nigeria is yet to grapple with the urgency of now, we are yet to accept that save and except this dysfunctional superstructure is RESTRUCTURED the present slide in the abyss will remain. Mayday!

But, Nigeria is NOT dead yet, Nigeria is however in the INTENSIVE CARE UNIT seeking the urgent rescue and redemptive intervention of Thinkers and Fixers. I pray we oblige our Dear Nigeria this time-tested call. I still believe in Nigeria.

I’m CHUKWUDUMEBI.

By Prof Chris Mustapha Nwaokobia Jnr.
Convener COUNTRYFIRST MOVEMENT. A Good Governance Advocacy Group.

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Nigerian Civil War (1967–1970) Also known as Nigerian-Biafran War 

0
From left, the Leader of the Biafran Peoples Army, Late General Dim Odimegwu Ojukwu and the Former Nigerian head of State, Retired General Gowon Jack Gowon
From left, the Leader of the Biafran Peoples Army, Late General Dim Odimegwu Ojukwu and the Former Nigerian head of State, Retired General Gowon Jack Gowon

The Nigerian Civil War was fought from 1967 to 1970 between Nigeria’s federal government and the secessionist state of Biafra. Ethnic conflict, economic inequality, and educational disparities were among the factors that contributed to the start of the war, which killed an estimated 500,000 to 3,000,000 people. Nigeria became an independent country on October 1, 1960. Abubakar Tafawa Balewa was its first federal prime minister—he had held that position since 1957—and Nnamdi Azikiwe became its president of the Senate, which was a largely ceremonial role. Following a UN-supervised referendum in 1961, the northern part of the Trust Territory of the Cameroons joined Nigeria’s Northern region, while in October the Southern Cameroons united with Cameroun to form the Federal Republic of Cameroon. On October 1, 1963, Nigeria became a republic, with Azikiwe as its president, although, as prime minister, Balewa remained more politically powerful. 

In Nigeria and its surrounding region, long-standing regional stresses—ethnic competitiveness, educational inequality, and economic imbalance being the most prominent—again came to the fore in a controversial census during 1962–63. In an attempt to stave off ethnic conflict, Nigeria’s Mid-West region was created in 1963 by dividing the Western region. Despite this division, the country still was segmented into three large geographic regions, each of which was essentially controlled by an ethnic group: the west by the Yoruba people, the east by the Igbo people, and the north by the HausaFulani people. Conflicts were endemic, as regional leaders protected their privileges; the South complained of Northern domination, and the North feared that the Southern elite was bent on capturing power. In the west, the government had fallen apart in 1962, and a boycott of the federal election of December 1964 brought Nigeria to the brink of breakdown. 

The point of no return was reached in January 1966, when, after the collapse of order in the west following the fraudulent election of October 1965, a group of army officers attempted to overthrow the federal government, and Balewa and two of the regional premiers were murdered. A military administration was set up under Maj. Gen. Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi, but his plan to abolish the regions and impose a unitary government met with anti-Igbo riots in the north. The military intervention worsened the political situation, as the army itself split along ethnic lines, its officers clashed over power, and the instigators and leaders of the January coup were accused of favouring Igbo domination. In July 1966 northern officers staged a countercoup, Aguiyi-Ironsi was assassinated, and Lieut. Col. (later Gen.) Yakubu Gowon came to power. The crisis was compounded by intercommunal clashes in the north and threats of secession in the south. 

Outbreak of war – Odumegwu Ojukwu

Lieut. Col. (later Gen.) Odumegwu Ojukwu led the secessionist state of Biafra from its declaration of independence in 1967 through its surrender in 1970, which ended the Nigerian Civil War. Gowon’s attempt to hold a conference to settle the constitutional future of Nigeria was abandoned after a series of ethnic massacres in October 1966. A last-ditch effort to save the country was made in January 1967, when the Eastern delegation, led by Lieut. Col. (later Gen.) Odumegwu Ojukwu agreed to meet the others on neutral ground at Aburi, Ghana. The situation deteriorated, however, after differences developed over the interpretation of the accord. In May the Eastern region’s consultative assembly authorized Ojukwu to establish a sovereign republic, while, at the same time, the federal military government promulgated a decree dividing the four regions into 12 states, including 6 in the north and 3 in the east, in an attempt to break the power of the regions. 

On May 30, 1967, Ojukwu declared the secession of the three states of the Eastern region under the name of the Republic of Biafra, which Nigeria’s federal government interpreted as an act of rebellion. Fighting broke out in early July. Within weeks the conflict had escalated into a full-scale civil war. In August 1967 Biafran troops crossed the Niger, seized Benin City, and were well on their way to Lagos before they were checked at Ore, a small town in the Western state (now Ondo state). Shortly thereafter, federal troops entered Enugu, the provisional capital of Biafra, and penetrated the Igbo heartland. The next two years were marked by stiff resistance in the shrinking Biafran enclave and by heavy casualties among civilians as well as in both armies, all set within what threatened to be a military stalemate. 

Peacemaking attempts by the Organization of African Unity (now the African Union), the pope, and others were ineffective, and Biafra began gaining recognition from African states (Côte d’IvoireGabonTanzania, and Zambia). France provided weapons to Biafra, while the U.K. and the Soviet Union sent arms to the federal government. Biafra also received aid from international organizations for its population, which was suffering from starvation. The final Biafran collapse began on December 24, 1969, when federal troops launched a significant offensive. Biafra was short on ammunition, its people were desperate for food, and its leaders controlled only one-sixth of the territory that had formed the Biafran Republic in 1967. Ojukwu fled to Côte d’Ivoire on January 11, 1970, and a Biafran deputation formally surrendered in Lagos four days later. The Republic of Biafra had come to an end. Estimates of the number of people who died during the Nigerian Civil War vary significantly, from 500,000 to 3,000,000. Causes included battlefield deaths, ethnic cleansing, and starvation. 

Aftermath – Yakubu Gowon – Nigerian Head of State Lieut. Col. (later Gen.) Yakubu Gowon, May 27, 1968.

Gowon was able, through his own personal magnetism, to reconcile the two sides so that the former Biafran states were integrated into Nigeria once again and were not blamed for the Nigerian Civil War. The oil boom that followed the war allowed the federal government to finance development programs and consolidate its power. In 1974 Gowon postponed until 1976 the target date for a return to civilian rule, but he was overthrown in July 1975 and fled to Great Britain. Nigeria’s new head of state, Brig. Gen. Murtala Ramat Mohammed initiated many changes during his brief time in office: he began the process of moving the federal capital to Abuja, addressed the issue of government inefficiency, and initiated the process for a return to civilian control. He was assassinated in February 1976 during an unsuccessful coup attempt, and his top aide, Lieut. Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo became head of the government. He did not run for the presidency in 1979, and Nigeria shifted to civilian rule, thus closing the era of military control during and around the Nigerian Civil War. 

Biafra Secessionist State, Nigeria 

Biafra, a secessionist Western African state that unilaterally declared its independence from Nigeria in May 1967. It constituted the former Eastern Region of Nigeria and was inhabited principally by Igbo (Ibo) people. Biafra ceased to exist as an independent state in January 1970. In the mid-1960s economic and political instability and ethnic friction characterized Nigerian public life. In the mostly Hausa north, resentment against the more prosperous, educated Igbo minority erupted into violence. In September 1966, some 10,000 to 30,000 Igbo people were massacred in the Northern Region, and perhaps 1,000,000 fled as refugees to the Igbo-dominated East. Non-Igbos were then expelled from the Eastern Region. 

Attempts by representatives of all regions to come to an agreement were unsuccessful. On May 30, 1967, the head of the Eastern Region, Lieutenant Colonel (later General) Odumegwu Ojukwu, with the authorization of a consultative assembly, declared the region a sovereign and independent republic under the name of Biafra. General Yakubu Gowon, the leader of the federal government, refused to recognize Biafra’s secession. Fighting began in July. Biafran troops were at first successful, but, as the Nigerian Civil War proceeded, the numerically superior federal forces began to press Biafra’s boundaries inward from the south, west, and north. Biafra shrank to one-tenth of its original area in the course of the war. By 1968 it had lost its seaports and become landlocked; supplies could be brought in only by air. Starvation and disease followed; estimates of mortality during the war generally range from 500,000 to 3,000,000. 

The Organization of African Unity, the papacy, and others tried to reconcile the combatants. Most countries continued to recognize Gowon’s regime as the government of all Nigeria, and the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union supplied it with arms. On the other hand, international sympathy for the plight of starving Biafran children brought airlifts of food and medicine from many countries. Côte d’IvoireGabonTanzania, and Zambia recognized Biafra as an independent state, and France sent Biafra weapons. Biafran forces were finally routed in a series of engagements in late December 1969 and early January 1970. Ojukwu fled to Côte d’Ivoire, and the remaining Biafran officers surrendered to the federal government on January 15, 1970. Biafra, on the point of total collapse, thereupon ceased to exist. 

Odumegwu Ojukwu, Nigerian military leader and politician, Also known as Ikemba Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu. 

Odumegwu Ojukwu (born November 4, 1933, in Zungeru, Nigeria—died November 26, 2011, in London, England) was a Nigerian military leader and politician, who was head of the secessionist state of Biafra during the Nigerian Civil War. Ojukwu was the son of a successful Igbo businessman. After graduating from the University of Oxford in 1955, he returned to Nigeria to serve as an administrative officer. After two years, however, he joined the army and was rapidly promoted thereafter. In January 1966 a group of largely Igbo junior army officers overthrew Nigeria’s civilian government but then were forced to hand power to the highest-ranking military officer, Maj. Gen. T.U. Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi (also an Igbo); appointed Lieut. 

Col. Ojukwu as the military governor of the mostly Igbo Eastern region. However, Hausa and Yoruba army officers from the Northern and Western regions feared a government dominated by the Igbo, and in July 1966 Northern officers staged a successful countercoup in which Lieut. Col. (later Gen.) Yakubu Gowon was installed as the new head of state. Under Gowon’s rule, Ojukwu retained his command of the Eastern region. Meanwhile, the rising tide of feelings against the Igbo in the Northern region led to large-scale massacres of Igbos by Northerners in May–September 1966. 

The Eastern region felt increasingly alienated from the federal military government under Gowon. Ojukwu’s main proposal to end the ethnic strife was a significant devolution of power to the regions. The federal government initially agreed to this solution at a conference in January 1967 but then rejected it soon afterwards. Ojukwu responded in March–April 1967 by separating the Eastern regional government’s administration and revenues from those of the federal government. Mounting secessionist pressures from his fellow Igbo finally compelled Ojukwu on May 30, 1967, to declare the Eastern region an independent sovereign state as the Republic of Biafra. Federal troops soon afterwards invaded Biafra, and civil war broke out in July 1967. Ojukwu led Biafra’s unsuccessful struggle to survive as an independent state throughout the civil war, and, on the eve of Biafra’s surrender in 1970, he fled to Côte d’Ivoire, where he was granted asylum. 

Ojukwu remained in exile until 1982 when he was pardoned and returned to Nigeria. He joined the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) in January 1983 and subsequently attempted to reenter politics; his bid for the senate representing the state of Anambra was unsuccessful. He was detained for 10 months following a coup that brought Muhammadu Buhari to power at the end of 1983. In 1993 he once again joined a political party, this time the Social Democratic Party, but he was disqualified from running for president. A member of constitutional conferences in 1993 and again from 1994 to 1995, he, along with other former Nigerian leaders, was consulted in 1998 by Abdusalam Abubakar, the military head of state, as Nigeria once again began the process of converting from military to civilian rule. In 2003 Ojukwu, representing a new political party that he helped form, the All Progressive Grand Alliance, unsuccessfully ran for president. He ran again in 2007 but was defeated by the ruling party’s candidate, Umaru Yar’Adua, in an election that was strongly criticized by international observers as being marred by voting irregularities. Ojukwu had several honours and titles bestowed upon him during his life, including the honorary chieftaincy title Ikemba of Nnewi.

Disclaimer

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

The iGeneration aka Gen Z! 

0
The iGeneration or Post-Millennials aka Gen Zee
The iGeneration or Post-Millennials aka Gen Zee

The Gen Z, also known as the iGeneration or Post-Millennials, is the cohort of individuals born roughly between the mid-1990s and the early 2010s. This generation is characterized by being digital natives, having grown up in a world where technology and the internet play a central role in their daily lives. As a result, Gen Z is often described as tech-savvy, socially conscious, and diverse. 

The age group that falls into the Gen Z category typically ranges from around 9 to 25 years old in 2024. They are the demographic cohort that follows the Millennials and precedes Generation Alpha, who are still children now. Gen Z is already making a significant impact in today’s world, both positively and negatively. 

One of the positive impacts of Gen Z is their strong emphasis on diversity, inclusion, and social justice issues. This generation is known for being vocal about important social, family and environmental causes, such as climate change, LGBTQ+ rights, racial equality, and mental health awareness. They are more likely to support brands and companies that align with their values, pushing corporations to be more socially responsible. But sadly, their judgment on moral values seems to be too worldly rather than spiritual. 

On the other hand, Gen Z’s reliance on technology and social media has led to concerns about their mental health and well-being. The constant exposure to digital devices and the pressure to curate a perfect online persona can contribute to increased rates of anxiety, depression, and loneliness among many young people today. Additionally, the spread of misinformation and social media trends can sometimes have negative consequences on their mental health and behaviour. 

As Gen Z continues to grow and eventually takes over the affairs of the world, the future promises to be shaped by their values and priorities, which parents need to pay much attention to instilling in them. With their focus on sustainability, equality, and innovation, this generation has the potential to drive positive change in areas such as climate action, social justice, and technological advancements. They are likely to challenge traditional power structures and bring new perspectives to the global stage. 

However, it is essential to consider that every generation comes with its own set of challenges and opportunities. The world will need to adapt to the strengths and weaknesses of Gen Z, just as it has with previous generations. The future impacts of this generation on mankind could range from significant advancements in technology and social progress to potential conflicts and struggles as they navigate a rapidly changing world. 

Ultimately, whether the world is better off with or without Gen Z is a complex question that cannot be answered definitively. Every generation brings both positive and negative aspects to society, and it is up to individuals, parents, and institutions to work together to create a better future for all generations. By understanding and addressing the needs and values of Gen Z, we can pave the way for a more inclusive, innovative, and sustainable world for generations to come. 

@NzeIkayMedia 

Disclaimer

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Enough of IMF/World Bank puppets!

3
Indermit Gill, World Bank Chief Economist and the Vice President of the World Bank
Indermit Gill, World Bank Chief Economist and the Vice President of the World Bank

INDIVIDUALS, corporate entities and countries which succeed are those who plan for the long haul, provide for contingencies and keep their eyes firmly on the ball. They think long-term; they delay immediate gratification; and they deny themselves the knowledge that things will turn out well in due course. Such individuals, corporate entities and countries do not cut corners. They follow due process. They are transparent. They only tweak their policies to align with their long-term goal(s). Their leaders complement these qualities by demonstrating emotional intelligence; delivering good governance; demonstrating prudence; and by exuding respect and fellow feeling for their compatriots. It is against this backdrop that one is prompted to reflect on the homily preached by Indermit Gill, the Vice President of the World Bank Group. At the recent 30th Nigerian Economic Summit, Mr Gill had said inter alia:

i) that “Nigeria must stay the course for another 10 to 15 years of focused reforms.” The difficult decisions today, will not yield immediate results, but they will set the foundation for a more prosperous and stable Nigeria”; 

ii) that the elimination of fuel subsidies and the floating of the Naira are necessary steps to stabilize and attract foreign direct investment(FDI); 

iii) that Nigeria should avoid the temptation of quick fixes; and 

iv) that periods of poor oil wealth management have left Nigeria trapped in cycles of boom and bust.

While the last observation is both apt and correct, especially as evidenced by several oil windfalls which were recklessly frittered away rather than their being invested either in the productive sector or infrastructure, his preachment was a mere sales pitch for the Bola Ahmed Tinubu administration and a stout defence of the World Bank Group. Nigeria has been carrying out IMF/World Bank reforms for decades. Pray, where have they led us, other than inflicting untold suffering on Nigerians and hurtling them downhill to a sorrowful abyss? To suggest that we need another 15 years of unremitting and toxic reforms, as they are being implemented by the hubristic Tinubu administration, is simply wicked. At the end of the day, nearly half of the population would have perished. As of now, inflation has crossed the 33 per cent threshold. More than half the population of the country cannot afford a decent meal in a day. Big and small businesses continue to fold up. Youth unemployment continues to grow, by leaps and bounds, thereby spawning misery, hopelessness, and crime and worsening the country’s insecurity.

What is intriguing is that the IMF/World Bank does not proffer or insist on similar prescriptions to the avatars and champions of capitalism. While they egg on our leaders to withdraw subsidies in every conceivable area, they do not spur their counterparts in the U.S., U.K. or France to do the same. Apart from the fact that the above-mentioned countries have put in place safety nets and unemployment benefits for their citizens, they subsidise many areas of endeavour chiefly to stimulate their economies and to succour their citizens. According to INVESTOPEDIA, the UK subsidizes such sectors as health insurance, technology, housing, education, electric vehicles and sustainable solutions. French farmers this year received a subvention of $1.8 billion to pay for the diesel to power their machinery. The United States government subsidises several areas as well. 

According to SUBSIDY TRACKER, one of the areas being heavily subsidised is the manufacture of electric vehicles and vehicle batteries. Automakers such as Ford, General Motors and Volkswagen are reported to be the chief beneficiaries. Sixteen states in the US committed $10.7 billion of public money to support companies such as Amazon and Tesla. It is thus a fallacy to argue that the only way to engender growth and prosperity is to pauperise the people, effect a wholesale removal of subsidy or allow market forces to go on a rampage. It is also wicked, in the extreme, to continue to corral our Central Bank to go on a binge of increasing interest rates. How can businesses grow when interest rates are as high as 27.25 per cent as obtained in our country? Assuming a contractor was to borrow at such a highfalutin rate, not to add Withholding Tax and VAT, how much, at the end of the day, will accrue to him as profit? Does this sorry situation not explain why nearly zero investments and businesses are taking place locally? Compare our prevailing interest rate of 27.25 per cent with that of the US at 4.55 per cent; that of the U.K. at five per cent; and that of France at 2.90 per cent and one understands why our businesses cannot grow and therefore why the economy is stunted.

Compounding this is our suffocating inflation rate of 33.40 per cent(as of July 2024). Again, compare this with that of the US at 2.44 per cent; that of the UK at 1.7 per cent; and that of France at 1.5 per cent and it becomes clear that we cannot grow if we subscribe, wholesale, to IMF/World Bank pieces of advice/conditionalities. What we should do is to act, informed and guided by our realities and by our experts. Thankfully, we have a surfeit of them. Bar the brutality and the treasury looting, the General Sani Abacha years stand out for economic stability. The Naira exchanged at N88 to the Dollar, with a window of N22 for manufacturers and contingencies such as medical attention. Professor Sam Aluko led the economic team, which worked assiduously. It was also guided by our peculiarities. We must find recourse in home-grown economic policies which resonate with our people and which address, squarely, their concerns. We must, henceforth, enthrone governments which are responsive, prudent, compassionate and keen to deliver good governance in the shortest possible time. 

By Nick Dazang 

Let me start by thanking the author of the above well-written article for explaining why Nigeria must ditch the IMF policies and their implementations and apply our initiative to counter our current hard economic conditions. Having said that and in agreement with him, I proffer the following.

Please, read on:

Just like the author rightly pointed out, Nigeria must indeed reassess its reliance on IMF policies and implementation strategies due to the detrimental impact they have had on the country’s economy and populace. There are several additional facts and arguments to support moving away from following IMF directives and instead focusing on developing and implementing Indigenous solutions:

1. Historical Context: Nigeria’s history of implementing IMF/World Bank policies has not led to sustainable economic development or improved living conditions for the majority of its citizens. The country has experienced cycles of economic hardship and instability despite following these external prescriptions for many years.

2. Socioeconomic Disparities: The IMF’s one-size-fits-all approach often fails to account for the unique challenges and needs of individual countries. In the case of Nigeria, the policies suggested by the IMF have exacerbated existing socioeconomic disparities, leading to increased poverty, unemployment, and inequality.

3. Sovereignty and Autonomy: By blindly adhering to IMF recommendations, Nigeria risks compromising its sovereignty and autonomy in making economic decisions that best serve its interests. The country must assert its independence and craft policies that align with its specific circumstances and objectives.

4. Lack of Accountability: IMF programs have been criticized for lacking transparency and accountability in their implementation, leading to misuse of funds and ineffective outcomes. Nigeria should prioritize accountability and ensure that economic policies are geared towards benefiting its citizens rather than external stakeholders.

5. Sustainable Development Goals: To achieve sustainable development and inclusive growth, Nigeria must prioritize initiatives that promote social welfare, environmental sustainability, and equitable economic progress. Relying solely on IMF policies may impede the country’s ability to pursue these critical goals effectively.

6. Local Expertise and Innovation: Nigeria boasts a wealth of intellectual capital and local expertise that can be harnessed to develop innovative economic solutions tailored to the country’s specific needs. By empowering indigenous experts and engaging in home-grown policy formulation, Nigeria can foster sustainable economic growth and resilience.

Conclusively, Nigeria must break free from the cycle of IMF/World Bank influence and chart its own course towards economic prosperity and social development. By investing in domestic resources, prioritizing local expertise, and crafting policies that reflect the realities of the Nigerian people, the country can overcome its economic challenges and build a brighter future for all its citizens. Enough of IMF/World Bank puppets; it is time for Nigeria to embrace its own path to progress. 

@NzeIkayMedia

Disclaimer: 

The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Indermit Gill, World Bank Chief Economist and the Vice President of the World Bank speaking about Nigeria’s IMF Economic programme

Happy Birthday, Retired General Gowon at 90! 

4
Former Head of State of Nigeria, Retired General Yakubu Gowon (1966 - 1973)
Former Head of State of Nigeria, Retired General Yakubu Gowon (1966 - 1973)

A few days ago, retired General Yakubu Gowon celebrated his 90th birthday with a ceremony brimming with joy and spectacle. At the event, he engaged in an interview with journalists but tactfully skirted around the issue of the genocide committed against the people of the Old Eastern Region. This atrocity was carried out by the Nigerian army with the backing of the British government while he held the positions of head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces of Nigeria from 1966 to 1970. 

It may have been anticipated that he would seize this opportunity to offer an apology to the families of the more than three million people of the Old Eastern Region of Nigeria (mainly Igbos) who perished under his leadership, but such a gesture was absent. Therefore, I am compelled to compose this piece to underscore the significance of taking responsible actions for the sake of future generations and to facilitate the complete reconciliation process in Nigeria. 

Kindly continue reading: 

Retired General Yakubu Gowon’s legacy remains tainted by the brutal actions he oversaw during the Nigerian-Biafran conflict of 1967-1970. His involvement in what many now recognize as a systematic genocide against the Biafran people has drawn comparisons to infamous dictators like Uganda’s Gen. Idi Amin. The events of that dark period continue to haunt the modern generations of the Old Eastern Region of Nigeria, who see Gowon as a ruthless leader who prioritized political and economic interests at the expense of countless innocent lives. 

The atrocities committed under General Yakubu Gowon’s leadership are well-documented and continue to evoke deep pain and trauma among the surviving victims and their descendants. The deliberate targeting of non-military spaces such as schools, markets, and churches, the ruthless bombings that claimed the lives of innocent civilians, including children, and the massacres that specifically targeted the people of the Old Eastern Region of Nigeria (especially Igbos) paint a grim picture of Gowon’s rule during those turbulent years. 

The Owerinta market bombing, the Osowa Ogbe Asaba massacre, the attacks on schools like Okigwe National High School, and the slaughter of unarmed Biafran soldiers who had surrendered all stand as stark reminders of the brutalities inflicted under Gowon’s command. The involvement of foreign powers like Britain, the USA, and others in supporting Gowon’s regime in carrying out these atrocities further underscores the magnitude of the violence that was unleashed on the Igbo people. 

General Yakubu Gowon’s refusal to acknowledge or apologize for the horrors perpetrated under his watch only adds to the lingering pain and calls for justice from the affected communities. The failure to address the truth of what happened during those years deepens the wounds and reinforces the perception of Gowon as a leader who valued power and control above human rights and decency. 

As Nigeria grapples with the consequences of its past actions, the echoes of the Biafran conflict reverberate in the present-day challenges facing the country. The marginalization of ethnic groups, the ongoing conflicts, and the cries for secession all bear the imprint of the violence and injustices of that era. Gowon’s role in shaping Nigeria’s current state of instability cannot be overlooked, and the need for reconciliation and accountability remains paramount. 

In light of General Yakubu Gowon’s recent 90th birthday celebration and his interview where he sidestepped the atrocities committed during his tenure, the wounds of the past are reignited. As the nation reflects on its history and seeks a path forward, acknowledging the truth of the past and holding accountable those responsible for the atrocities is essential for healing and moving towards a more just and inclusive future. Only by confronting the dark chapters of its history can Nigeria hope to build a more peaceful and united nation where the rights and dignity of all its citizens are respected and upheld. 

Also attached with this write-up below is the letter allegedly written by Retired General Yakubu Gowon to the then British Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, requesting him to intervene and prevent the BBC, Financial Times, and The Economist from reporting the genuine situation in Biafra. This request was made in return for oil supplies as these media outlets were seen as aiding the Nigerian Army by providing arms. 

@NzeIkayMedia

Disclaimer: 

The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

This letter allegedly written by Retired General Yakubu Gowon to the then British Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, requesting him to intervene and prevent the BBC, Financial Times, and The Economist from reporting the genuine situation in Biafra. This request was made in return for oil supplies as these media outlets were seen as aiding the Nigerian Army by providing arms. 

Exploitation and instability in Nigeria: The Orkar coup in perspective!

0
One of the key actors of the attempted coup - By Captain Tolofari
One of the key actors of the attempted coup - By Captain Tolofari

One of the key actors of the attempted coup, Captain Tolofari, who escaped into exile after the coup failed, later put his thoughts together in a book titled “Exploitation and instability in Nigeria: The Orkar coup in perspective”, which was published in 2004, detailing the ideological pinning of the putsch and how it was executed. Here is a brief excerpt:

“…We had all the money we needed to buy our needs. This was by the courtesy of Great Ovedje Ogboru. Great Ogboru, a schoolmate of Mukoro’s and his personal friend, did not take part in the military preparations, he merely gave us the money and most of the officers did not know him. Our plan was not to use any military material. While Mukoro was still my CO at Ojo, we had written a report for the reorganisation of the security of the cantonment, the biggest in the country and at that time having about 37,000 residents – officers, soldiers and their families as well as civilian squatters. We asked for and were issued with new signal sets, but none of them was working. We found a company that dealt in such equipment to repair them for us. Still they did not work. During our preparations, I found the address of the company so that we could buy our own sets and this we did eventually. Great Ogboru already had a number of J5 buses and Peugeot 504 station wagons, all brand new, which he put at our disposal. Even our assembly area was his office and warehouse premises. Since we had obviated the need for military material, it drastically reduced the chances of discovery while we were making our plans, as snooping around for such military material in the units would have raised questions and jeopardised our security and secrecy.

During this period, Captain Empere and I travelled to Port Harcourt, to generally feel the pulse of the people and especially to meet the signatories of a certain document, a petition to the federal government concerning the rights and expectations of the Rivers people in relation to the conditions under which they had joined the creation of Nigeria at independence. These conditions were part of the agreements reached at the Lancaster House Conference of 1957.1 had received nebulous information about this petition and the organisation that was pursuing the matter from some soldiers of Rivers State origin who had come from home. Empere and I left Lagos at 1730 hours on March 5, travelling by road in my car. Unfortunately, well after we had passed Ijebu-Ode, we had an engine knock and had to be towed back to Itako village for repairs. The engine of the car was brought down and disassembled. It was already 2300 hours by the time this was accomplished and we had to spend the night in the mechanic’s workshop. The next morning, I went with one of the mechanics to Ijebu-Ode for spare parts. The job was completed at 1630 hours and driving at between 60 and 80 kilometres per hour, we arrived at Port Harcourt by 2300 hours.

When we met on Good Friday, for our coordinating conference, Mukoro and I insisted that we should strike during the Easter, but led by Lieutenant-Colonel Nyiam for the conveyance of ammunitions and arms. I think that it might have made some difference if we had struck then, in terms of the displacement of people, many of the senior officers might have routinely travelled out of Lagos. As it turned out eventually, we did not have much, if any, use for the armour crew that we eventually got.

All this while, a very important aspect of our military operations was going on regularly, namely, the conduct of reconnaissance. Empere who lived in Ikeja Cantonment and was likely to operate there, conducted nightly recce. For hours each day he would go round the units and duty posts. He spent a lot of time speaking with the soldiers on duty on different days, studying their routine. Col Nyiam, Majors Obahor and Mukoro, as well as the other junior officers, also conducted their own recce. I reconnoitred the Ojo Cantonment. I studied the routine at the main gate and various other gates with new and particular attention. On occasions, I deliberately kept late nights or utilised my late return from our discussions to recce at night. I studied the HQ armoury and magazine of the 149 Mechanised Infantry Battalion (149 Mech Inf. Bn), the only teeth-arm in that cantonment, sometimes waking up in the middle of the night to go and walk around and observe reactions.

Lt Henry Ogboru who had worked with me in the same unit until he left for the university to read Law, was one of the young officers tasked to arrest senior officers. I agreed to lend him my car to go to Lagos mainland and Victoria Island to conduct recce. On Tuesday, April 17, he went on his own to conduct daytime recce. The next day, I went with him to conduct night recce between 2130 hours and midnight.

It will cause some wonder that we planned a revolution on such a gigantic scale that would involve cutting away about one-third of the country of over one hundred million people, under a sadistic military regime, that we had gone so far in our plans, yet we had no arms and ammunition – not until the day we struck. We did not import any arms and ammunition as the government lied in its campaign after the putsch. Great Ogboru did not use his fishing trawlers to import arms into the country for us, “packed as fish”. We decided to take our weapons and ammunitions from a military base, the Signals Barracks at Mile II. Consequently, on Thursday April 5, Obahor, Mukoro and I reconnoitred the barracks at about 2000 hours. We studied the location of the combined armoury and magazine, the layout of the entire barrack, the location of the security posts and the habits of the soldiers on guard duty. On Saturday April 7, Obahor, Mukoro, Empere and I drove to the barracks after our discussions, for confirmatory recce at exactly the period we would eventually raid the armoury.

We stated and stressed over and over, that nobody should be shot, except where that person gave us effective resistance. Effective resistance would mean that degree of resistance that would cause death, grievous injury, or terminally incapacitate our personnel, or which would be capable of stopping us from achieving our objective in any given operational area. We knew that the soldiers who would be offering the resistance were not the people we had in mind to reach, we did not have any need to engage in battle with and waste the lives of men who were merely working for their pay.

My assigned mission was to take the Ojo Military Cantonment. That meant that I was to capture and dominate the cantonment.

During the week between the Easter and when we finally struck, we recruited one officer, Lieutenant S. O. S. Echendu. He and Lieutenant P. O. Obasi, were the only Igbo officers we used. His recruitment became necessary because we wanted to take Dodan Barracks, the seat of the government and residence of the President, and in doing so we wanted to breach the security and operate from the inside. It had been suggested in the earlier stages of the planning to siege it and ask the President to surrender to us. The suggestion was to use armoured vehicles that would have been taken from the Bonny Camp and the site of the Giwa Project in this siege until all other parts of Lagos had fallen to us. I strongly objected to this suggestion. Lt-Col Nyiam and Captain Empere also supported this objection.  

As Captain Empere remarked, we were not fighting Roman wars. The idea was quickly discarded and there was general agreement that we should go in shooting. But since we did not have enough men to commit to this kind of frontal attack, the best thing to do was to find a way to operate from the inside, using sabotage. We studied the guard detail for the Dodan Barracks critically and recruited the officer in charge of the armour detail inside the place for the week we were to operate.

Lt Echendu was tasked to simply put his turret down and blow the place apart. Once he did that at H-Hour, more troops were going to move in to give him support and extricate him. It was a high-risk mission that would in any case put the officer under cross fire. The officer was very courageous. It was the same kind of plan that we had for the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria. Lt Emmanuel Okekumatalo was the officer on duty at the FRCN for the week ending on Easter Sunday. The officer was to take good control of the soldiers who would be working under his command and allow entry to the troops that would later come to take the place, led by Major Gideon Gwarzo Orkar. As well, we recruited the officer who was in charge of the security detail of the Chief of Army Staff, Lt-General Sani Abacha. He was 2’Lt Umukoro. We knew very well the routine of the COAS. He met with the President at Dodan Barracks between 2000 hours and midnight, then he went from there to his guest house/harem, where he slept with a number of women, including, as we found out during our preparations, a former beauty queen. The harem was off Alexander Road. He left for his marital home, the Flagstaff House, daily by 0500 hours. Again, the task of the officer was to give access to our troops and if there was any movement on the part of the COAS, to radio such movement and new location to us, since he would follow wherever the COAS went.

When D-Day was shifted from the night of Holy Saturday/Easter Sunday, it appeared as if we were going to lose those chances of operating from the inside. We took some quick action. It was arranged for the three officers, Lt SOS Echendu of the 201 CHC at Dodan Barracks, Lt Emman Okekumatalo at the FRCN and 2’Lt Umukoro with the Chief of Army Staff, to still maintain the same duties on the night of 21/22 April, 1990.

Major Mukoro, Capt. Dakolo, Capt. Empere, Lt Ahere and Lt Obasi were to take the 123 Guards Bn, 242 Recce Sqn, 201 CHC and the 9 Mech Inf Bde HQ, all based at the Ikeja Cantonment. It was a Herculean task for the number and standard of fitness and training of the men available to them, but it was not easier for any other group. They were to overpower all guards, seize all serviceable armoured vehicles and convert them to our use, or immobilise any that we could not use. It was Empere and I that contrived to invite Captain Dakolo to come and join us. He was stationed in Zaria, so Empere sent his batman with the transport fare, with the message that Dakolo should take home his wife and come to Lagos to join us. He came two weeks before the operation.

Capt. Idele was tasked to take the men to Dodan Barrack to support Echendu in overpowering the Presidential guards and give him cover to be able to extricate himself when he was through with his task. But he was first to take Bonny Camp.

Lt-Col Nyiam was to take the Giwa Project, move the armoured cars that were serviceable there along with the troops he would mobilise, to go and support both the FRCN and the Dodan Barracks.

Major Gideon Gwarzo Orkar was tasked to lead men to take over the FRCN and ensure that the mission statement was broadcast to the nation promptly at 0600 hours on April 22, 1990. The message had been recorded the previous Friday. Even though Orkar, a very intelligent and fearless officer, played this major role, he was not the kingpin in the planning of the putsch. In fact, we were not to invite officers of Benue State origin, for good reasons. Orkar, as it turned out, was the only one from the Middle Belt to join us. Major Orkar of the Armoured Corps was the commander of a tank battalion. Had he been with us for a longer period, he could have helped us get a proper armoured crew.

Major Obahor was to incapacitate the 2 Mech Inf. Div., with headquarters at Ibadan, by disrupting their radio communication with Lagos and other divisions. He was then to move to the Lagos/Ibadan tollgate and hold position there.

Four arrest squads were set up. As already stated, one of the principles we were working on was the elimination of command. The expression was not to imply killing the commanders. It meant separating the commanders from their troops, through arresting them and keeping them out of reach, incommunicado. The effect would have been to put the troops in disarray and make them inactive. Soldiers, especially Nigerian soldiers and in the circumstance of a coup, who know that their commander has been taken were not likely to put up much fight. This would have made it easier for us to take command of those troops and use them for our purposes. Subalterns led all these four groups: Lt H.A Ogboru (not related to Great Ogboru), Lt Gohe, Lt Odey and Lt Akogun.

At the final coordinating conference, at 2200 hours on Friday April 20, there were seventeen of us, including three civilians (Great Ogboru was not there) and two Senior Non-commissioned Officers (SNCOs) – a Staff Sergeant and a Sergeant. The eighteenth man only came down from upstairs to pray for us and went back to his room. That was all the role that he played. The SNCOs also were there only to be told their specific roles. They were soldiers who worked under Mukoro and I. In all, there were only twelve of us officers. Our troops were ex-service men mainly, numbering just over two hundred, in addition to a few serving troops that various officers brought along with them as they came to the assembly area on the final day.

Lt-Col Nyiam and Major Mukoro directed the conference. I sat to Nyiam’s immediate right. Empere sat to my right. Major Orkar sat two seats away from Empere and Capt. Idele sat at a desk in front of the bookshelves. We reviewed all the arrangements. We confirmed the H-Hr for 220200A apr 90, that is: 2.00a.m local time (one hour ahead of GMT) on April 22, 1990. The move to the assembly area (assy area or AA) was fixed for 2130 hours on April 21, 1990. Arrangement had already been made to move the troops from their various hotels all over Lagos where they had stayed for two weeks, to the assy area. Officers coming to the assy area and the soldiers they were taking with them were to come in mufti, taking their uniforms in bags. They were to move in small teams, using their cars and giving lifts to those who had no cars.

On Thursday April 20, Empere and I went to the Balogun market to buy canned food, tinned fish and biscuits. We aimed to feed the soldiers at their duty posts for the four to five days it would take for absolute calm to return, during which period it would be difficult for them to go home for meals. Variously, we had also shopped iron cutters, ladders, crowbars, torches, ropes, batteries and about every other thing we thought would be needed. We earmarked petrol stations from which we could get fuel and later pay their owners. We tested the communication sets we had bought. Then we read the mission statement and made some corrections.

The coordinating conference ended at about 0200 hours on Saturday. At the close of it, those officers who did not know the assy area (Great Ogboru’s business premises) were taken there and shown the place.

After all this, they had loaded their magazines and I made them stoop in a circle while I gave them a brief outline of my assault plan. I had sketches of the layout of the 149 Mech Inf. Bn area….”

On how he executed his own plan at Ojo cantonment, Tolofari narrated: ”… With the capture of the Duty Officer and the desertion of Capt. Oziegbe, my option for the arrest of the Cantonment Commander and CO of 149 Mech Inf. Bn changed. Taking four soldiers from among the ones I had mobilised, I marched the 2’Lt to the Colonel’s house. With this time lapse, it is attributable to the swiftness and stealth of the operation and a small sprinkling of luck that the CO had not been awakened from his slumber, because his wife who had arrived Lagos from their last posting only that week, happened to be in his bed chamber that night. Had he been roused and apprised of what was happening, he could have been able to reach his officers and also mustered at least forty soldiers from the various guard posts around the cantonment. Our situation would have then replicated with what happened at the Ikeja Cantonment.

The 2’Lt told the soldiers at the CO’s gate to open the gate and wake the Colonel so that he could lodge an urgent report. They obeyed. But when my soldiers tried to disarm them, one of them resisted. I raised my pistol to his head and one of his colleagues asked him, “Wetin you dey struggle, you be fool!” I left two soldiers with the disarmed and proceeded with the lieutenant and two other soldiers to the building. The lieutenant rang the bell, but it was a long time before the house girl spoke through the window that the Colonel was asleep and that she could not go to wake him because his wife was with him. As the officer insisted that he must see the Commandant, the wife overhead and came out. She was asked to go and wake her husband up. She asked what the matter was and was merely told again to wake her husband up. Eventually he came out. I knew he had a pistol at home. I expected him to come out armed with it, so I took the precaution of tactically placing the two soldiers and myself. In anticipation of his appearance, I had also dug the muzzle of my pistol into the back of the second lieutenant.

The Colonel asked the young officer what the disturbance was about and was informed that the battalion headquarters had been captured in an operation and that he, the Duty Officer himself, was a captive. The CO asked in an aggressive voice, “What are you telling me? You are my Duty Officer and you’re telling me that my battalion headquarters has been taken?” I cut him short and told him I was arresting him. He looked at me challengingly for a moment, and then opened his mouth to speak as I continued to hold his eyes. I nodded to the soldier behind me and he stepped forward with handcuffs. It dawned on the senior officer, I believe, that there was nothing he could do. He stretched his hands and was manacled. As an afterthought, he asked me if he could go and brush his mouth and change the rubber slippers he was wearing. In my mind I laughed. The oldest trick in the game!

As we passed by the Officers Mess, I asked two soldiers to take the CO and the three captive-soldiers to the Duty room. I added, “escort them to the Duty room, if anyone of them tries to escape, shoot him, don’t think about it.” I further instructed that the CO should be detained in the MP interrogation Room, but that the soldiers should be put in the guardroom. Even in the circumstance I had to respect his rank.

It was 0400 hrs then. Radio silence had been broken some thirty minutes earlier. Lt-Col Nyiam had opened the net and conducted radio-check and asked for situation reports. Major Gideon Orkar reported from the FRCN that he was in control; Lt Echendu at the Dodan Barracks also reported that the area had been taken; Captain Empere at the Ikeja Cantonment reported that they had encountered opposition; I reported that I had taken all the key points in the Ojo Cantonment and that I would soon go for the arrest of the Cantonment Commandant. As I made my movement towards the residence of the Cantonment Commandant, I heard on our radio that the ADC to the President, Lt-Col Bello, had died while he was escaping, probably shot by his own men. Indeed, the Radio House and Dodan Barracks, the seat of the presidency, were both taken within the first thirty minutes of the putsch. But for the fact that I still did not have the Commanding Officer in my kitty, I would have been in this league.

When I gave the order to the soldiers to escort the CO to the Duty room, I went with the 2’Lt to change into his own uniform. He had been wearing the uniform of a soldier, which I had commandeered for him, since his had been taken off him when he was arrested. I also went and arrested the adjutant of the battalion, who was my course-mate at the Defence Academy. While I was effecting the arrest, Lt-Col Nyiam called me again and asked for the SITREP (situation report). I replied, ‘Objective taken. One four nine HQ under command. Charlie-Oscar taken PW. Mobilisation in progress.’

I was indeed making a lot of progress with the mobilisation, more and more soldiers were coming out and being armed from the stock of weapons at the MP Duty room. I had not taken arms out of the AHQ Pro Bn armoury because I did not want to break it. At about 0500 hrs I took a car and went to the Officers Village to arrest the second-in-command of the 149 Bn, who lived only three houses away from me on the same street. In his own case, his daughter first peeped from the window, then his wife came out to ask what the matter was about, before he eventually came out. He too asked to be allowed to go back inside and change his clothes. I told his wife to go in and bring trousers and a shirt for him, as he was not dressed.

Not long after that, I was called again and asked when I thought it would be possible for me to send reinforcements to the FRCN. I said I did not have enough to send at the time, I was sure most of the soldiers were waiting to hear the announcement of the revolution on the radio before they would commit themselves. Indeed, some of them actually did say so. Captain Empere at the Ikeja Cantonment reported once more that they were still not in control; there was quite a skirmish there. Later in the morning, I saw a soldier, with a bullet wound, who came from there. He confirmed that a real fight was going on there. He said that he needed to go to the clinic for treatment and needed some money, which I gave him.

Our mission statement was read promptly at 0600 hrs, April 22, on the network of the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria (FRCN).”

Disclaimer

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Bola Tinubu: A President ready to risk it all for future generations – By Michael Chibuzo

0

This man called President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is painstakingly doing an architectural redesign of Nigeria’s economic foundations. He has chosen to be the scapegoat and anyone who understands Nigeria’s structural problems should be grateful that a Bola Tinubu is President of Nigeria today. This is a President who appears not to be bothered about re-election politics and moves like one ready to sacrifice his immediate personal political interests for the long-term health and survival of his dear country. At the moment and in the foreseeable future, his attempt to solidify the foundation of this federalist state called Nigeria would bring about pains – a lot of it actually. It took us a long to enter the ditch, we must not expect to get out of the ditch overnight or in four years. To cure this pain, we must finish the treatment. We must not stop halfway. The World Bank, an institution we love to hate, said this much recently. And they are very right on this. It takes a President who is not afraid to lose elections to do the unpalatable foundation jobs required to fix Nigeria. President Bola Tinubu has continued to lay the institutional foundations that many feel are impossible or suicidal to pull off. I will enumerate some of the major ones, which justify why I so much believe in the abilities of President Bola Tinubu to succeed – it’s not blind faith.

1. Tax and Fiscal Reforms: This was one of Tinubu’s earliest moves. Just like what Tinubu did when he became Lagos governor, his first major policy move was to reform the revenue and tax administration system in Nigeria. He set up the Tax and Fiscal Policy Reforms committee headed by Taiwo Oyedele and in less than a year they delivered a great job, which has metamorphosed into the Economic Stabilisation Bills (ESB) currently before the NASS. Through these bills, Tinubu wants to amend about 15 different tax, fiscal, and establishment laws to facilitate economic stability and set the country on the path for sustained inclusive growth. On Oct 3, the President forwarded four executive bills to the NASS. 

These bills are the Nigeria Tax Bill, Nigeria Tax Administration Act (Amendment) bill; Nigeria Revenue Service Bill and Joint Revenue Board (Establishment ) Bill. When passed into law, these bills would among other things help to harmonize the multiple tax laws in the country with the big one being the stripping of Customs, NIMASA, Immigration, NPA and other revenue-generating agencies the powers to collect revenues. Revenue collection through NRS would reduce the cost of collection drastically and increase the efficiency of revenue collection by blocking many leakages and applying centralised innovations. Customs and co would be made to focus on their core duties. FIRS would be rebranded to Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) which would collect all taxes that should go to the federation account. Each tier of government would then get its own share. In fact, Tinubu wants FG’s share of VAT revenue to shrink to 10% from the current 15%. He wants the subnationals to have more revenue to finance new powers donated to them in the second schedule of the 1999 constitution (as amended). Most importantly, these tax reforms would see 90% of income earners and small businesses in Nigeria being exempted from taxes. In another clime, this would be celebrated as a landmark legacy.

2. Full deregulation of PMS: Despite the accompanying enormous discomfort in many aspects of our economic life, President Tinubu has been focused on achieving full deregulation of the downstream oil sector. It appears that he has achieved this milestone because today, Dangote Refinery is selling PMS to any willing buyer. NNPC Ltd is no longer the sole off-taker of PMS from Dangote Refinery nor are they the sole importer of the product. NNPC is selling PMS and other petroleum products at the prevailing market prices. It took a while to get to this point, but so far in October petrol imports into Nigeria have reduced by 80%. It means by the end of this year we would likely become totally self-sufficient in PMS and be exporting excess. The best way to tackle corruption is to eliminate the incentive fueling the corruption. The subsidy regime, no matter how one wanted to manage it, was always bound to open opportunities for corruption and shortchanging of the public purse by those in the system either through opaque crude oil swap or cost under-recovery by the NNPC Ltd. Cross-border smuggling of PMS from Nigeria to our neighbouring African countries would not stop totally for some reasons, but it would no longer be a drain on Nigeria’s public purse.

3. CNG Revolution: The full deregulation of the downstream oil sector has invariably made CNG become a much more attractive proposition with many now seeing it as an alternative they must embrace because it is way cheaper. Some argue that CNG alternatives should have been put in place before the PMS subsidy was removed but it’s not that straightforward. Once PMS was still cheaper than CNG, there was little incentive for people to convert their cars to run on CNG. The cost of conversion of vehicles to be able to run on CNG is relatively high. Meanwhile, as long as FG was still shouldering the PMS subsidy burden, it would not have the revenue to finance any CNG initiative on a meaningful scale. Therefore, so long as subsidies still kept PMS prices below that of CNG or marginally above it, the CNG revolution would not have started.

The Buhari administration around 2020 or 2021 tried the Autogas initiative (which includes CNG adoption) as he moved towards full PMS deregulation. However, there was limited success in the CNG component as adoption was not widespread. Before the subsidy removal, what was happening basically was that manufacturing firms started adopting CNG to provide electricity for their firms instead of using diesel (deregulated in 2004), whose price was skyrocketing. Today, CNG is becoming popular with many vehicle owners eager to switch from PMS to CNG. FG is stimulating this switch as well through the setting up of many conversion workshops across many cities and offering subsidised conversion fees by @PCNGInitiative. This increasing demand for CNG has encouraged CNG market leaders in Nigeria such as NIPCO, in partnership with the FG, to invest more in establishing CNG refuelling stations. In a couple of years, CNG filling stations will definitely become common across the country.

3. Student Loans: Tinubu against all odds has also activated the student loans programme and institutionalised it. In one of the executive economic stabilisation bills President Tinubu sent to the NASS, a special provision was made to guarantee and increase the source of funding available for the student loans programme just like TETFUND, UBEC fund and Basic Health Care Provision Fund get funds from guaranteed deductions from the consolidated revenue fund of the federation. The student loan scheme, administered by @NELFUND at zero interest rate, is fast becoming a lifesaver for many students, especially in these very difficult economic times. This can only be a product of deliberate thinking, which of course Tinubu is known for.

4. Consumer Credit Scheme: This is another institutional policy of President Bola Tinubu, which just like the student loan, has the backing of an Act of Parliament. It is a revolutionary tool administered by @CrediCorpNG that will allow income earners to purchase goods and services they need but cannot afford to pay for at once with a lump sum. The scheme has kicked off with civil servants who have a verified income and employment history. Thousands of beneficiaries are already getting their funds at very concessionary interest rates. Eventually, the scheme will be extended to other income earners who are not civil servants. This would unlock a huge demand for goods and services that would been impossible without a cheap consumer credit scheme.

5. Monetary Policy Reforms: President Bola Tinubu took the unpopular but inevitable route of allowing the Naira to float while scrapping the multiple exchange rate windows the @cenbank put in place since 2017 as it desperately tried to manage FX demand and supply. Cardoso’s FX policy was just like returning to the basics – allowing demand and supply to determine rates. The monetary reset came with so much pain and Nigerians are still reeling from the effects in the form of high prices of goods and services. However, that was the only way forward. We need to face our demons and accept our realities, which would enable us to claw ourselves out of dark tunnels. Tinubu has always faced challenges headlong and on this FX issue, he allowed the CBN to face it boldly. Our reality is that we don’t have abundant FX reserves to peg the Naira to a rate that would lower the cost of imports, so there is little we can do in the interim other than to allow the market to determine the rate. Not pegging the Naira is costly, however, pegging it when you do not have enough FX to saturate the market is suicidal. Today, despite the pains it brought, we can see visible improvements. Currently, our gross foreign reserves are close to $39 billion up from $34 billion in May 2023. This is despite the CBN’s liquidation of over $6 billion FX backlog within months. We must stay this course and target further accretion of the foreign reserves, possibly to over $60 billion by 2027.

6. Agriculture: Food sufficiency and security has been one of our major problems and despite so many previous government programmes in Agriculture, it appears we are yet to find a sustainable way to ensure food sufficiency and food security. Tinubu apparently has come to understand that having sufficient food for Nigeria does not start and end with giving loans to farmers. In the absence of a permanent institutional foundation, we will continue to hover in circles with no sustainable solution in sight. Agriculture is one of the few areas where the three tiers of government are constitutionally empowered to operate. For Nigeria to achieve food security, the FG, states and LGAs MUST be seriously invested in agriculture. No matter what FG does, if the 36 states and 768 LGAs in those states do not deliberately take agriculture seriously, Nigeria will never achieve food sufficiency.

So, what is the Tinubu administration doing in agriculture? Apart from the expected FG interventions in the form of inputs and implements to commercial farmers for both the wet season and dry season farming in the major agricultural belts of the country, the Tinubu administration has begun the groundwork, though not very visible at this time, for deepening mechanised agriculture across the country as well as storage and agro-processing. Under Tinubu, the federal government through @NGfmafs wants to recalibrate how support is extended to farmers in a manner that yields commensurate value and is sustainable. This is why Tinubu approved four projects/programmes under the agriculture mechanisation programme which include:

a) Greener Hope Programme, a $1 billion PPP arrangement where FG will provide a $200 million counterpart fund (already approved by FEC). Under this programme, 1,000 agro-service centres will be established across farming belts to provide essential services including tractor hiring services and aggregation services (both at the input purchase and produce sale levels), among others. This will enable those smallholder farmers who may not be able to afford tractors to hire or lease a tractor to do their farm preparations and also be part of an aggregation cluster to get better value when selling their produce or purchasing farm inputs. The tractorisation component of this program involves the procurement of 2,000 tractors per annum for the next five years. Each of these tractors would come with ploughs, harrows, seeders, planters as well as spare parts. These tractors unlike before are not meant to be given out free of charge or at subsidised rates but would be managed by those employed by the private partners that provided the $800 million counterpart fund as a business. This is more sustainable.

b) The John Deere deal, which involves another procurement of 2,000 tractors per year for the next five years from John Deere Ltd. Last month FEC approved the establishment of a local assembly plant for 2000 John Deere tractors, combine harvesters, disc riders, bottom ploughs and other farm equipment. The plant has a completion time of six months. In five years, we expect 10,000 tractors and other accessories from John Deere.

c) Belarus Tractors deal involving procurement of yet another 2000 tractors comprising four different types; 80 horsepower and 90 horsepower, two-wheel drives and four-wheel drives for each of the different categories, which will have 500 tractors each. That also will come with all the other implements with about 9,000 assorted sets of spare parts. The project also comprises 12 mobile service workshops that will come along with all needed supply items. 10 pieces of 150 horsepower combined harvesters are also included.

d) Green Imperative Programme (GIP), which started 7 years ago under PMB but has not taken off. It is a €950 million programme that will be funded by Deutsche Bank, with the backing of the Islamic Development Bank. The GIP does not require any counterpart funding from Nigeria, but it requires a sovereign guarantee. It involves among other things setting up of one service centre for every local government, 774 LGAs of the Federation. 

Apart from the GIP, which has not started, the other three programmes would deliver a cumulative of 6000 tractors to power mechanised farming in Nigeria. In the next five years, a total of 30,000 tractors and other accompanying implements would have been procured through these programs. Why is this a big deal? You cannot have mechanised agriculture without enough tractors, ploughs, harrows, seeders, planters and combine harvesters. Belgium with a landmass of 30,689 sq kilometres and a population of around 11.7 million, has 206,500 farm tractors. Nigeria with 923,7770 sq kilometers and a population of over 220 million has only 45,000 farm tractors. How do you expect to achieve mechanisation of agriculture to produce adequate food for such a huge population with such a meagre number of tractors? FG is targeting an additional 30,000 tractors in the next five years, the 36 states need to have their own targets, same with LGAs (theirs is even more important). This is why President Tinubu in his October 1st speech urged states yet to join the Federal Government in investing in mechanised farming to do so. Tinubu noted that the is playing its part by supplying fertiliser and other farm inputs as well as making tractors and other farm equipment available and I agree with him. The states own the lands. If they are serious about agriculture, Nigeria will enter an agricultural boom. Already FG is also working with AfDB, Islamic Development Bank and IFAD to set up Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones in seven pilot states.

Some people may gauge a government’s success in agriculture by the amount of loans or credit the FG gives to farmers but if we are to be honest with ourselves, we must change from that method because it is very inefficient and unsustainable. How many farmers can you give enough credit or support? How many farmers would even use the credit or loan to farm? Nigeria has about 40 million farmers. How many can you support with fertiliser, farm implements and other inputs? I agree with @SenatorAKyari that the best way is to provide an environment for the farmer to grow and he will be happy to do it. Make him cut down his losses and provide an incentive for him to participate in agriculture, since part of the problems that we are facing is that people are not interested in laborious activities. This is why mechanisation across the entire agricultural value chain is the long-term answer.

I do not want to further elongate this piece by going on to highlight many other right moves that President Bola Tinubu is making in the areas of road infrastructure, power sector reforms, and security, as well as his bold attempt to restructure and re-energise the local government system for a more efficient federation. If you critically look at the things President Bola Tinubu is doing in the areas I just listed, you would see a President who is intentional about building a strong edifice and not quick fixes. Beyond the economic hardship, many Nigerians are grappling with, I see a not-too-distant future where cheap CNG will be rivalling PMS and diesel as major transport fuels; I see a near future where more households and businesses will have at least 20 hours of electricity; and where Nigerians (both civil servants and non-civil servants) can easily access consumer credit. A time will soon be upon us when students struggling to fund their tertiary education will have a sure way out through the student loan scheme. I foresee Nigeria having a revenue-debt service ratio below 40%, a revenue-GDP ratio above 18%, and a budget deficit near 3%.

I am seeing on the horizon, a Nigeria where our major roads are smooth and safe, where our strategic food reserve is filled to the brim with sufficient supply of staple foods and where rural communities and farmland are free from bandits and kidnappers. Above all, I would love to see a Nigeria where a Bauchi state governor @SenBalaMohammed would be bringing hundreds of thousands of hectares into cultivation instead of shamelessly blaming the federal government for hunger. I would love a situation where an Anambra State Governor like @CCSoludo would be giving the LGAs in his state additional subvention to better provide services to their people instead of seizing 90% of their FAAC allocations.

President Bola Tinubu is surely willing to risk it all by doing what is painfully necessary and unpopular at the moment, just to have our country stand on its feet. He is obviously not minding any potential damage it may inflict on his personal electoral interests. That is how statesmen roll. @officialABAT has led the way, it is therefore extremely important that governors and LGA officials come out from their closets and complement Tinubu’s efforts in their states and LGAs respectively. Enough of hiding behind the finger and buck-passing. We can only crawl our way far away from the precipice when every moving part of this complex machine called Nigeria is working in synchronism. Let’s do this!

By Michael Chibuzo

Haven painstakingly read the above, let me counterpunch it. 

The glowing praise for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration presented in this essay is a stark contrast to the current reality on the ground in Nigeria. It is important to critically analyze the points raised and expose the fallacies embedded in the narrative.

1. Tax and Fiscal Reforms: While the essay depicts President Tinubu as a visionary leader implementing comprehensive tax and fiscal reforms, the truth is that the proposed bills are facing significant opposition and backlash. The actual implementation and impact of these reforms remain uncertain, and there are concerns about their potential to burden the already struggling populace with additional financial responsibilities.

2. Full Deregulation of PMS: The claim that the deregulation of the downstream oil sector has been a success is misleading. The purported reduction in petrol imports and the functioning of Dangote Refinery do not address the underlying issues of corruption and inefficiency in the oil sector. The impact on everyday consumers, particularly the vulnerable groups, has been severe with skyrocketing fuel prices and increased economic hardship.

3. CNG Revolution: While the promotion of CNG as an alternative fuel source is commendable, the reality is that the transition has been chaotic and poorly managed. The sudden removal of PMS subsidies without adequate infrastructure for CNG adoption has left many Nigerians stranded and struggling to adjust. The lack of a clear transition plan has exacerbated the economic burdens on the populace.

4. Student Loans and Consumer Credit Scheme: The portrayal of these initiatives as life-saving programs fails to acknowledge the systemic challenges facing the education and financial sectors in Nigeria. The implementation of these schemes lacks transparency and accountability, raising questions about their long-term sustainability and impact on the intended beneficiaries.

5. Monetary Policy Reforms: The decision to allow the Naira to float has led to economic instability and hardship for ordinary Nigerians. The persistent inflation and high prices of goods and services have eroded the purchasing power of citizens, exacerbating poverty and inequality. The reliance on market forces without adequate safeguards has exposed the vulnerabilities of the Nigerian economy.

6. Agriculture: The ambitious plans outlined for agricultural mechanization and food security are yet to materialize on a significant scale. The structural and institutional challenges within the agricultural sector remain unaddressed, hindering the effective implementation of proposed programs. The disconnect between policy pronouncements and on-the-ground realities highlights the gap between rhetoric and results.

In all, the portrayal of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as a visionary leader making tough but necessary decisions for the future of Nigeria is a distortion of the current state of affairs. It is essential to separate rhetoric from reality and hold leaders accountable for their actions and policies based on tangible outcomes and sustainable impacts on the lives of the Nigerian people. 

@NzeIkayMedia

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

The challenge for my generation and the coming ones ………. – By David Hundeyin

0
David Hundeyin is an Investigative Nigerian journalist and author. He founded the West Africa Weekly, a Substack newsletter. David Hundeyin. His reporting style, at times open-sourced which has won him multiple awards but also earned him criticism. Chimamnda Ngozi Adichie, the writer, has once called him a "brilliant" investigative journalist.
David Hundeyin is an Investigative Nigerian journalist and author. He founded the West Africa Weekly, a Substack newsletter. David Hundeyin. His reporting style, at times open-sourced which has won him multiple awards but also earned him criticism. Chimamnda Ngozi Adichie, the writer, has once called him a "brilliant" investigative journalist.

Four years ago on October 20, 2020, my ongoing journey began with the Lekki Massacre, just a few kilometres from my apartment. Within the next 17 days, I was forced to smuggle myself out of Nigeria and I haven’t been able to go back since. In the intervening period, I have spent time in a Ghanaian safe house, I have been declared wanted for “national security violations” in Nigeria, and I have survived a kidnap/assassination attempt in Accra organised by the (now former) Director of the National Intelligence Agency, Ahmed Rufai Abubakar. 

In all this time and across all these experiences, one piece of wisdom I heard from my good friend @YarKafanchan has never left my head and remains my true north. She said it in passing one evening in 2021 when we were hanging out at Breakfast 2 Breakfast, Osu, and she probably didn’t realise that what she said was so profound that it would remain stuck in my head forever. She said: “Nigeria’s biggest trick is convincing you that nothing is happening. Meanwhile, everything is happening.” She said that in the context of us figuring out whether the Buhari regime had forgotten about teaching us #EndSARS people a lesson, and if we should risk returning home, I took that pearl of wisdom, expanded its application, and made it my True North for analysing Nigeria.

Nigeria was not always this way, but after decades of deliberate actions by internal and external actors, it has become the country where “nothing happens.” When it comes to anything consequential, meaningful and positive like favourable trade policy, economy-boosting infrastructure projects, or diplomatic and geopolitical positioning to enhance regional integration, nothing happens in Nigeria. It is frozen in time and covered with dust and cobwebs. To all intents and purposes, nothing is happening. But behind the scenes, when it comes to listening to the counsel of American economic hitmen and piling on ruinous dollar-denominated debt that the country categorically does not need, or when it comes to spending billions of dollars on developing military, intelligence and law enforcement capacity, only to use it to monitor the young girlfriends and political opponents of middle-aged big men with potbellies, everything is happening. Nigeria may not be able to generate more than 5,000 MW of electricity for 200 million people. Still, when it comes to using NIA field agents – actual intelligence operatives trained expensively in Israel and North Korea – to go after outspoken Nigerian citizens in foreign countries, everything is happening. 

This is why I cannot bother myself with who Peter Obi chooses or does not choose to wish Happy Birthday to. It’s not that I don’t think Yakubu Gowon is a genocidal a-hole. It’s that his involvement in what happened between 1966 and 1970 is not even the worst or most disastrous thing he has done. The worst things Yakubu Gowon did came AFTER the war, and they are why we are where we are today. Nigeria as it existed then, was one of the most powerful countries in the entire Global South, and a very consequential country on the world stage. Nigeria was a country that funded liberation movements in other countries, used its economy and military to massive geopolitical effect in Africa, gave out foreign aid, and came within one Ajaokuta Steel Complex of becoming Africa’s first proper industrial economy. Most of this period, when Nigeria was one of the world’s real movers and shakers in the decade between 1970 and 1979, fell under Yakubu Gowon’s tenure. The Nigeria he had was a country where everything was happening, and everybody could see that everything was happening. Nigeria was one of the players moving pieces on the global chessboard, and not merely one of the pieces being moved.

Yakubu Gowon had the unique opportunity with a postwar Nigeria that found itself economically, militarily and geopolitically in the proverbial Garden of Eden, to lead the country into World Power status. There was a perfect storm of geopolitical circumstances, and Nigeria was right in the sweet pot. The country had real money to spend on infrastructure and industrialisation, and very little foreign debt. It had de-facto geopolitical leadership of Sub-Saharan Africa and infinite possibilities for continental alignment and integration. He didn’t even have to worry about winning an election every 4 years. All he had to do was deliver leadership. If he had delivered Sub-Saharan Africa’s first industrialised nuclear power, Africa and the African diaspora would have finally had an untouchable base to build from, and the world would never again have been able to treat Black people with the levity it continues to do in 2024. I am 34 this year. Gowon became Head of State at 33. He found himself leading this budding postwar superpower with everything falling into place for it at 37. And what did he do with this once-in-a-century opportunity?

He did Cement Armada. Udoji Awards. Offshore bank accounts. Contract and invoice inflation. Free Nigeria Airways flights for anyone who could get a “note” from a military officer, which eventually ran the airline into the ground. Cars, houses and holidays in London for girlfriends of big men in government. The beginning of the Rolls Royce culture in Ikoyi. During his 5 postwar years in power, Nigeria for the first time began piling on dollar-denominated foreign debt that it did not need, which was the fuel for the explosion that came 15 years later called IMF Structural Adjustment.

He met a country that was powerful and competent enough to hatch its own foreign influence and subversion operations around the world. Nigeria used to be so consequential that every single liberation war it directly or indirectly intervened in swung the way it wanted. From Lagos, the outcomes of liberation wars in Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Namibia were decided. By the time he and his mad dog successor Murtala Mohammed left the scene, Nigeria had gone from this to a victim – a country that couldn’t pay its debts, started suffering electricity blackouts, and ended up having American intelligence penetrate its core, to the point where the outcome of elections or post-coup succession was decided by people like Susan Rice. It was once a country where everything happened in plain sight, but by the time Yakubu Gowon and the Class of 1966 were done, it became Nigeria we know today – a benighted country where you have to be highly connected or extremely intelligent to even suspect when anything is happening because, to all intents and purposes, nothing ever happens.

The challenge for my generation and the coming ones is to hijack and regain control of our collective destiny, which Yakubu Gowon and his contemporaries lost for us. They inherited the Black world’s most powerful country and potent nation-state. They bequeathed a parody of a country that has been fully captured by economic hitmen, where the CIA has been able to openly install a drug peddler with urinary incontinence to become puppet president of the largest Black country in the world – a level of blatant disrespect that illustrates just how much has been taken from us. 

Instead of getting mad at Peter Obi for wishing such people Happy Birthday (which doesn’t actually change the figurative price of garri in the market), our generational challenge as Millenials and Zoomers is to wrest back control of our country and its governance, intelligence, law enforcement and military institutions from the foreign interests that took them from our 90-year-old “senior statesmen” who sold their children for the proverbial mirrors, gin and red cloth. Getting angry at Yakubu Gowon is pointless and is not going to save us. Getting mad at people wishing him Happy Birthday is borderline asinine. He has already got what he wants out of life. At 90, he has amassed a lifetime’s worth of oyibo’s mirrors, gin and red cloth, and the Black superpower he once led is now dragging status with Eswantini and Sao Tome & Principe. We should be happy for him. He is a fulfilled man who led a life that clearly fills him with fulfilment. We have our own mission now, and it is to start undoing his damage. In our lifetime, Nigeria should once again become a country where everything is happening. It has to happen soon. Otherwise, 200 million people go kpai.

Let’s be guided.” Brain damage: “David, I have just one question. Do you in any way miss this hellhole Nigeria?”

David Hundeyin: “Home is home. And if it happens to be a hellhole, it’s not because that is its default state of being. Someone or something made it that way, and someone or something can also undo it.

All of us in the diaspora are Externally Displaced People. We may talk as if we’re living our best lives, but deep down, we all know that we’re lying. The only thing really keeping most diasporans where they are is the ability to send £250 home and watch it turn into 500k…”

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Russia-Ukraine. Tension, Inability of Western Allies to Understand the Mystery of the Russian Soul

17
Professor Maurice Okoli is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Professor Maurice Okoli is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.

There is nothing more difficult and yet more gratifying in our world today than living with sincerity and acting from a place of large-heartedness towards humanity’s growth and betterment. Politics or no politics, Geopolitics or no geopolitics, the truth is that Russians are very pleasant people and the common features of the Russian character are generosity, resilience, and strength. Russians are people of humanity. Humanitarian assistance is embedded in their culture and ways of life. Russians believe in the oneness of all human beings. They believe in the strong helping the weak and giving without expecting. Russians are inventive people with a huge capacity to endure and overcome big difficulties with a strong spirit. The Russian person is often a mystery because of many extremes tied together in his soul. Russians are modest and patient and can endure for a long time, but when they eventually rise, they go to the end. Courage and sacrifice for the sake of the motherland and nation is a very Russian trait. Cold planning and calculations as it is in the West are not for the Russians. They are pushed by brilliant insights and unconventional thinking. 

They stopped Napoleon and saved the world, got not enough gratitude from the world, and still felt all right with that. They stopped Hitler and saved the world from fascism, got not enough gratitude from the world, and also felt all right with that. However, Russians have a sense of history. They have not forgotten and will never forget how in the process of saving the world from fascism lost about 27 million of its citizens, entire families beheaded, babies burned, mothers bayoneted, and little kids short in the back.

Patriotism holds an important place in Russian culture. They are proud of their history and contributions to the world. Russian Federation is the largest nation in the world, spanning 11 time zones and many different geographical environments. Russia contains an incredible diversity of people, beliefs, values, and lifestyles. Russia is a particularistic and collectivistic society. Russia does not like uncertainty and highly values stability and security. The expansion of NATO close to Russian borders is a serious source of concern, uncertainty, instability, and insecurity. The thought of Ukraine becoming a member of NATO which is the cause of present tension between Russia and the West is a dark red line for Russia. They will never allow it no matter the circumstances. The mystery of the Russian soul shows that they have risen and they are prepared to go to the end. My humble advice is that the West should look at the demands and enter into serious negotiations with RussiaThey should reconsider the idea of Ukraine becoming a member of NATO. I think Russia will never allow it to happen and Ukrainian leadership should know this too well and must be very careful in navigating this difficult period of their history. 

There is a popular aphorism in the former Soviet Union which says that whenever Ukrainian is born the Jews cries. The Ukraine people are intelligent people and they need that their intelligence to avoid the impending doom and catastrophe that is about to befall on their nation. Geographically, they are neighbor to Russia and with common boarder. And an attempt to join NATO is not the best way to be a good neighbor to your big neighbor which is Russia. The tie between Russia and Ukraine is so deep and historical. It dates back to at least the 9th century with the founding of Kyivian Rus, the first East Slavic state. They are close relatives and at the beginning of the 20th century, the Russians formed the largest ethnic group in almost all the large cities within Ukraine’s modern borders including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, Mykolaiv, Donetsk, Luhansk, Mariupol, Ekaterinoslav, Kropyvnytskyi, Sevastopol, Kerch, Yalta and Simferopol. This shows a widespread presence of Russian-speaking individuals in urban centers across Ukraine. The Russian-speaking population in Ukraine has been a significant demographic factor, especially in the eastern and southern regions, and has played a crucial role in the linguistic and cultural landscape of the country. According to the 2001 Ukraine census, individuals who identify themselves as ethnic Russians accounted for 17.3% of the population of Ukraine. In the western and central regions, Ukrainian has been the predominant language in these regions, and there has been a historical emphasis on Ukraine’s national identity and independence. Russia has swallowed a bitter pill of NATO admitting former member-nations of Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact into its fold over the years and some of these countries are even becoming hyperkinetic aggressive towards Russia under the NATO umbrella. 

The golden rule says you do unto others what you will like others to do to you but unfortunately, in today’s world there are tiny group of individuals who decides what happens in it. This tiny group of people are sometimes called global decision-makers or international decision-makers. This golden rule is not for them and it is unimaginable the level of insanity this tiny group of people are willing to exhibit in order to protect their so-called interest. The world should know that any conflict between Russia and Ukraine as result of an attempt by Ukraine to become a member of NATO will encompass a range of issues including threat of nuclear war with its broader implication to global security. In the request by Russia on NATO to hold talks with its on-security guarantees, Russia made it loud and clear that admission of Ukraine into NATO is a dark red line that must not to be crossed. It gave reasons that the implication of having NATO bases in Ukraine would neutralize its own nuclear deterrence since it would not have enough time to react to any missile fired from Kiev that takes few minutes to reach Moscow. Russia even went as far as submitting a framework proposal to negotiate upon that would guarantee that Ukraine will remain neutral and never be admitted into NATO.

At this juncture it is important for us to refresh our memories to the Cuban crisis of the 1960s, in which the American President late President Kennedy faced the risk of a nuclear war with the Soviet Union by taking action to block the deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba which the USA considered as its neighbor. That crisis was quietly resolved by NATO agreeing to remove the nuclear missiles deployed in Turkey which Soviet Union considered as a threat to it security and Soviet Union agreeing to withdraw the deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba which Washington considered as a threat to its own security. USA will never tolerate the deployment of Russian weapons in any of its border region such as Canada or Mexico. Why then do NATO thinks Russia will tolerate it. Sanctions will not deter Russia if they decide to invade Ukraine. Russians are prepared to do anything humanly possible in order to prevent Ukraine from slipping out of their orbit of influence or joining NATO. 

Russia is such a huge and important country to the world that any attempt to seriously sanction Russia will have a devastating effect to the word economy and might not achieve the goal of the sanction. The structure of the Russian imports from the West are mainly consumable goods and services which Russia could easily find an alternative sources of supply while the export of Russia to West are mainly products of energy and energy-intensive industries which the alternative sources are limited in nature and might not be easily replaced. Besides, Russian economy is huge and it is tied to the wellbeing of the economy of many countries and when the push comes to shove many countries will put their economic interest first and will sabotage if not outright refusal to join the sanctions against Russia. 

The stage has been set and it is provocative, inflammatory and incendiary. Russia will be pushed beyond limit. It will be extremely difficult but not impossible for Russia to overcome the provocation by not invading Ukraine. I think that Russia has a deep understanding that the game being watched is not the game being played. The game being played is to bring two Slavic brotherly countries to fight each other thereby creating permanent enmity between the two countries and to use Ukraine as an instrument to weaken Russia militarily, economically, geopolitically and otherwise.

My prayers and heart go out to the Ukrainian people who have become victims in the big game of geopolitics. The people of Ukraine should pray and work hard for a political and diplomatic solution to the current crisis because the alternative will be disaster and calamity of unimaginable proportions to the Ukrainians people. The accusation that Russia wants to expand and recreate the Soviet Union has nothing to do with reality. It is mere speculation and assumption.  Russian plans are not to expand Russia geographically but to protect Russian security interests from NATO expansion towards its borders. 

The world is standing on many pillars but the four major and important pillars are Russia, China, Europe and United States of America. In the interest of the world peace, prosperity and development, these four pillars need to work together and not against each other. The relationship between Russia and USA is complex and multifaceted. The two nations have a long history that includes periods of both collaboration and conflict. The Cold War era is often cited as a time of significant tension between these two great countries. In recent years, geopolitical events have led to strain relations. However, while there are certainly challenges in the relations between Russia and USA, it is important to recognize that the dynamics are not purely adversarial. Russia is a victim of American internal politics, American military-industrial complex and American media. America needs an enemy and Russia fits that role. The American military-industrial complex needs to justify the huge defense budget. To keep the billions of defense dollars flowing, they need Russia as an enemy. The actual threat to America’s number one position economically and militarily in the world if any could be China and American internal politics. Making Russia an enemy thereby driving Russia into the hands of the Chinese is not a good foreign policy strategy. The drum of war is beating and it is beating louder and louder. During a news conference in Berlin with his German counterpart, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken warns that any invasion and act of aggression will be met with a swift, severe, and united response. As a matter of urgency, there is a need to tone down the rhetoric of war. There is an urgent need for de-escalation from all sides involved. One miscalculation or one misjudgment could trigger a disastrous war. 

Professor Maurice Okoli is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Celine Dion: An Iconic Canadian Music Legend 

31
Celine Dion: An Iconic Canadian Music Legend -Overcoming Stiff-Person Syndrome: Celine Dion's Resilience and Strength
Celine Dion: An Iconic Canadian Music Legend -Overcoming Stiff-Person Syndrome: Celine Dion's Resilience and Strength

Celine Dion, a Canadian music icon, was born on March 30, 1968, in Charlemagne, Quebec, Canada. She was the youngest of 14 children, born to Adhemar and Therese Dion, both of whom were of French-Canadian descent. From a young age, Celine showed a remarkable talent for singing and performing, often entertaining her large family with her powerful voice and natural stage presence. 

In her early life, Celine began her singing career at the age of 12 when she recorded her first demo with the help of her brother, Michel Dion. Her talent quickly caught the attention of music producers and she released her first album in 1981, at the age of just 13. Despite initial struggles to gain mainstream success, Celine’s breakthrough came in the late 1980s when she won the Eurovision Song Contest in 1988 with the song “Ne partez pas sans moi,” propelling her to international fame. 

Celine Dion’s personal life has also been a significant aspect of her public image. In 1994, she married her longtime manager, René Angélil, who had been a supportive figure in her career since the beginning. The couple had three children together, René-Charles, and twins Eddy and Nelson. Despite facing challenges in their relationship, including René’s battle with throat cancer, their love and partnership endured until his passing in 2016. 

Apart from her successful music career and personal relationships, Celine Dion has faced health challenges that have impacted her life and career. In recent years, she has been open about her struggles with vocal cord issues and had to undergo surgery in 2018 to address them. Despite these setbacks, Celine has continued to perform and thrill audiences around the world with her powerful voice and emotional performances. 

Currently, Celine Dion remains one of the most successful and beloved music artists in the world. Her contributions to the music industry have earned her numerous awards, including Grammy Awards, Billboard Music Awards, and an Academy Award for the song “My Heart Will Go On” from the movie Titanic. She continues to tour and perform to sold-out crowds, captivating audiences with her timeless music and charismatic stage presence. 

Celine Dion’s journey from a young, talented girl in Quebec to a global music icon is a testament to her resilience, passion, and unwavering dedication to her craft. Her life story is one of triumph over adversity, love, loss, and the power of music to touch hearts and inspire millions around the world. Celine Dion’s legacy as a Canadian music legend will undoubtedly endure for generations to come. 

Overcoming Stiff-Person Syndrome: Celine Dion’s Resilience and Strength

In recent years, the renowned singer Celine Dion has faced a formidable challenge in the form of Stiff-Person Syndrome, a rare neurological disorder that has had a significant impact on her life. Despite the physical and emotional toll of the illness, Celine Dion has exhibited remarkable resilience and strength as she navigates through the difficulties and bravely works towards overcoming them.

Stiff-Person Syndrome is a rare and disabling condition characterized by severe muscle stiffness and spasms, often accompanied by anxiety and emotional distress. For someone like Celine Dion, whose voice and physicality are essential to her career as a performer, the diagnosis of this debilitating illness came as a devastating blow. However, instead of letting it define her, Celine has chosen to confront the disease head-on with courage and determination.

Navigating through the challenges of Stiff-Person Syndrome, Celine Dion has shown exceptional grace and fortitude. She has openly shared her struggles with the public, raising awareness about the condition and destigmatizing discussions around chronic illness. By speaking out about her experiences, Celine has inspired others facing similar health battles to seek help, find support, and remain hopeful in the face of adversity.

One of the key aspects of Celine Dion’s journey towards overcoming Stiff-Person Syndrome is her unwavering commitment to her health and well-being. Through a combination of medical treatments, physical therapy, and holistic practices, she has been proactive in managing her symptoms and maintaining her strength. By prioritizing self-care and seeking guidance from healthcare professionals, Celine has shown that with perseverance and dedication, individuals can take control of their health and make positive strides towards recovery.

Moreover, Celine Dion’s resilience in the face of Stiff-Person Syndrome serves as a powerful example of the human spirit’s capacity to endure and triumph over adversity. Despite the challenges she faces on a daily basis, Celine continues to pursue her passion for music and performance, proving that physical limitations do not have to define one’s dreams or aspirations. Her unwavering commitment to her artistry and her fans is a testament to her unwavering spirit and determination.

In conclusion, Celine Dion’s journey through Stiff-Person Syndrome is a story of courage, resilience, and hope. By openly sharing her experiences, seeking proper care, and facing her challenges with unwavering strength, she has become a beacon of inspiration for many. While the road to recovery may be long and arduous, Celine’s journey is a reminder that with perseverance and determination, one can overcome even the most daunting obstacles. Celine Dion’s story is a testament to the power of the human spirit in the face of adversity, and her resilience serves as a source of encouragement and inspiration to all who are facing their own battles.

@NzeIkayMedia

Kindly use the following link to watch a documentary on Celine Dion at 56, Celine Dion Is Saying Goodbye After Her Tragic Diagnosis; https://youtu.be/44rynVkktZw

Disclaimer: 

The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

The Economic Impact of Igbo Businesses in Russia 

1
Nze Ikay Umenne, CEO, Nze Ikay Media. General Secretary, Igbo Community Russia, Welfare Secretary Emeritus, Nigerian Community Russia.
Nze Ikay Umenne, CEO, Nze Ikay Media. General Secretary, Igbo Community Russia, Welfare Secretary Emeritus, Nigerian Community Russia.

The Economic Impact of Igbo Businesses in Russia – An Interactive Media session with Nze Ikay Umenne, The CEO. Nze Ikay Media, General Secretary of the Igbo Community Russia and Welfare Secretary Emeritus, Nigerian Community Russia. Here is a detailed point-by-point analysis of the economic impact of Igbo businesses in Russia:

1. Job Creation – Local Employment: Igbo businesses in Russia often employ local Russian citizens, providing job opportunities and reducing unemployment rates. 

– Community Employment: They also provide jobs for fellow Igbo and other African expatriates, fostering a sense of community and mutual support.

2. Trade and Commerce – Import-Export Activities: Many Igbo businesses engage in the import and export of goods between Russia and Nigeria (as well as other countries), facilitating international trade.

– Supply Chain Development: These businesses contribute to the development and diversification of supply chains, ensuring a variety of goods and services are available in the Russian market.

3. Economic Diversification – Sectoral Contributions: Igbo entrepreneurs are involved in various sectors such as retail, wholesale, manufacturing, and services, contributing to the diversification of the Russian economy.

– Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Many Igbo businesses are SMEs, which are crucial for economic stability and growth, providing resilience against economic shocks.

4. Cultural Exchange and Market Expansion – Cultural Products and Services: Businesses often introduce Nigerian and broader African cultural products (e.g., food, fashion, music) to the Russian market, promoting cultural diversity.

– Market Expansion: By introducing unique products and services, these businesses help expand the market and meet diverse consumer needs.

5. Investment and Capital Flow – Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Igbo entrepreneurs often bring capital from Nigeria and other countries into Russia, contributing to FDI.

– Reinvestment: Profits generated by these businesses are often reinvested locally, fostering economic growth and development.

6. Innovation and Entrepreneurship – Business Innovation: Igbo businesses often bring innovative business practices and models, enhancing competition and efficiency in the market.

– Entrepreneurial Spirit: They contribute to a vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem, inspiring both locals and expatriates to start their own businesses.

7. Tax Revenue: Tax Contributions – These businesses contribute to the local and national economy through taxes, including corporate taxes, VAT, and employment taxes, which support public services and infrastructure.

8. Social and Economic Integration – Community Development: Successful Igbo businesses often engage in community development projects, contributing to social welfare and cohesion.

– Economic Integration: By actively participating in the economy, Igbo entrepreneurs help bridge cultural and economic gaps, fostering better integration of expatriates into Russian society.

9. Skill and Knowledge Transfer – Training and Development: Many Igbo businesses provide training and skill development opportunities for their employees, enhancing the overall skill level of the workforce.

– Knowledge Exchange: These businesses facilitate the exchange of business knowledge and practices between Nigeria and Russia, enriching both business environments.

10. Networking and Global Connections: Business Networks: Igbo entrepreneurs often create and participate in extensive business networks, both within Russia and internationally, fostering global connections.

– Trade Associations: Participation in trade associations and chambers of commerce helps in advocating for business-friendly policies and creating a better business environment. 

In recent years, the global economy has witnessed a significant rise in international business ventures that transcend geographical boundaries. One particular example of such cross-border economic activities can be observed in the growth of Igbo businesses in Russia. This essay aims to explore the economic impact of Igbo businesses in Russia and how this interaction influences both Igbo and Russian cultures. 

The Igbo people, predominantly from southeastern Nigeria, have a long history of entrepreneurial spirit and business acumen. This has led to the establishment of numerous successful Igbo businesses not only within Nigeria but also abroad, including in Russia. These businesses span various industries such as trade, manufacturing, and services, contributing to the economic development of both countries. The presence of Igbo businesses in Russia has had a significant impact on the local economy by creating job opportunities for both Nigerians and Russians. This has helped in reducing unemployment rates and fostering economic growth in the regions where these businesses operate. Additionally, Igbo businesses have stimulated trade between Nigeria and Russia, resulting in an increase in bilateral trade volumes and strengthening economic ties between the two countries. 

The influx of Igbo businesses in Russia has not only shaped the economic landscape but also influenced the cultural dynamics between the two nations. The interactions between Igbo entrepreneurs and Russian locals have led to the exchange of ideas, customs, and traditions, creating a cultural fusion that enriches both societies. 

The fusion of Igbo and Russian cultures has brought about a greater appreciation for diversity and multiculturalism, fostering a more inclusive and harmonious society. This cultural exchange has also led to the incorporation of Igbo customs and practices into the fabric of Russian society, enriching the cultural tapestry of the country. Moreover, the presence of Igbo businesses in Russia has served as a bridge for cultural diplomacy and understanding between Nigeria and Russia. By engaging in business activities, Igbo entrepreneurs have facilitated cultural exchange and enhanced people-to-people relations, fostering mutual respect and cooperation between the two nations. 

Igbo businesses in Russia have a multifaceted economic impact, from job creation and trade facilitation to cultural exchange and economic integration. Their contributions are significant in fostering economic growth, diversification, and social cohesion. The economic impact of Igbo businesses in Russia extends beyond financial gains and trade relations. It has also played a crucial role in shaping cultural interactions and fostering mutual understanding between the Igbo and Russian communities. As Igbo businesses continue to thrive in Russia, the cultural exchange and economic cooperation between the two nations will further strengthen, paving the way for a more interconnected and prosperous global economy. Overall, the relationship between Igbo businesses in Russia demonstrates the transformative power of cross-cultural interactions and the enriching effects of a diverse and inclusive global marketplace.  

Courtesy of AfiaTV & NzeIkayMedia

Kindly use the following link to watch the interactive session. https://youtu.be/TPgRunaML9Q?si=6Wl8sw0lhxFnI7zW

Disclaimer: 

The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

CRISES IN APGA? IS INEC PURPOSELY CREATING CONFUSION IN APGA? 

0
Mazi Ejimofor Opara KSM, National Publicity Secretary, APGA.
Mazi Ejimofor Opara KSM, National Publicity Secretary, APGA.

INEC has just updated its website and now officially updated the Name of Chief Edozie Njoku as the Authentic National Chairman of APGA. You can verify the above on INEC website using the following link; https://www.inecnigeria.org/…

And Now, the Counterpunch, please read on: 

PRESS STATEMENT BY APGA! 

Our attention has been drawn to a Statement released earlier today by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) where the commission purported to accord recognition to one Edozie Njoku as the National Chairman of APGA. In the said Statement, the Commission purported to have based its incongruous decision on the judgment delivered by the Court of Appeal which affirmed the earlier judgment of an FCT High Court. 

We wish to state categorically that the Commission’s purported interpretation of the Court of Appeal judgment was patently wrong and defies logic. Firstly, the judgment of the FCT High Court, Bwari Judicial Division never pronounced Edozie Njoku as the National Chairman of APGA. The Judgment of the Court of Appeal equally did not. There is no judgment of court that mandated INEC to recognize Edozie Njoku as National Chairman of APGA. There is no evidence anywhere that INEC ever monitored any convention by Edozie Njoku and his co-travelers, and no court ever declared him Chairman of APGA. The INEC in arriving at the bizarre decision claimed to be complying with the judgment of the High Court which was upheld by the Court of Appeal and which sought to enforce the earlier judgment of the Supreme Court as corrected on the 24th of March, 2023. Whereas nowhere in the entire judgment of the Supreme Court did the Court make any pronouncement to the effect that Edozie Njoku was the National Chairman of APGA just like the Just like the High Court and Court of Appeal never did. 

This fact is further strengthened by the concurring judgment of one of the Justices of the Court of Appeal that sat on the panel who stated clearly that the Supreme Court never pronounced Edozie Njoku as National Chairman. One therefore wonders which judgment INEC was purportedly complying it when they arrived at such reasoning. 

Secondly, Edozie Njoku had sworn to an affidavit that he purportedly won the National Chairmanship position in a non-existent Owerri convention in 2019 which is a 4 year tenure. Assuming without conceding that there was any such thing, the tenure of the National Leadership of APGA, the subject matter of the suit at the lower court has since elapsed in 2023. For the sake of clarity, the suit at the trial Court bothered on the authentic Leadership of APGA between 31st of May, 2019 to 31st of May, 2023. It is common knowledge that APGA has since conducted its National Convention that ushered in the current set of National Officers under the leadership of Barrister Sly Ezeokenwa. 

Again, there is no subsisting judgment of court which pronounced Edozie Njoku as National Chairman of APGA. The only place that the name Edozie Njoku ever showed up was when one Jude Okeke went to a high court in Birnin Kudu, Jigawa State alleging to be the National Chairman of APGA after a non-extistent NWC had removed Edozie Njoku. The entire allegation being a concoction and figment of his mischievous imagination were rejected by the Court of Appeal Kano which upheld Victor Oye as the National Chairman of APGA and which judgment was expressly affirmed by the Supreme Court in its judgment. 

Thirdly, the correct interpretation of the Supreme Court corrected judgment has since been laid to rest by the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja Division coram Hon Justice James Omotosho wherein he held that the Supreme Court never pronounced Edozie Njoku as National Chairman of APGA and that Chief Victor Ike Oye was at all material times, the duly elected National Chairman of APGA at that time. The above pronouncement has since been affirmed by the Court of Appeal. One therefore wonders how the Commission chose to ignore the earlier Court of Appeal judgment on APGA leadership which was upheld by the Supreme Court. This stand of the Commission as expressed in its Statement stands both law and facts on the head and same is hereby rejected by our great party. 

Even more worrisome is the fact that neither the National Chairman, Barrister Sly Ezeokenwa, nor the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) was a party to the suit which led to the Judgment being purportedly enforced. Not even Edozie Njoku himself was a party to this suit under review. How then has the INEC constituted itself a “Father Christmas” by deciding ignorantly by fiat to choose who becomes APGA National Chairman? 

The information reaching our Party was that the Commission was put under immense pressure to take the hasty decision based on the blackmail and threat that a high court was going to sentence the INEC Chairman to prison for a purported contempt of Court. Hence, the Commission chose to ignore a pending Appeal and Motion for Stay of Execution filed by Chief Victor Oye which is yet to be determined by the Court of Appeal and purported to enforce a Judgment which clearly did not pronounce Edozie Njoku Chairman. This is against the admonition of the Supreme Court in a plethora of Judicial authorities that pending Court processes, especially a motion for stay of execution, must be respected so as not foist a situation of helplessness on the Court. 

We wish to state emphatically that Edozie Njoku is NOT the National Chairman of APGA as no Court of law anywhere in the country has pronounced him as such. While we recognise the Constitutional mandate of INEC to regulate the activities of political parties, we however state that such mandate must be exercised within the ambit of the law and not arbitrarily. Certainly, the latest decision of the Commission is a clear illustration of arbitrariness taken too far.  

As a law abiding Party and believers in the sanctity of our judicial system, we have instructed our team of lawyers to challenge this impunity in the law court. I restate that whatever is the issue has no bearing with the extant leadership of APGA. APGA as a Political Party has since moved on from the intractable tussle between Chief Victor Ike Oye and Edozie Njoku and INEC ought not constitute itself as a clog in the wheel of progress that APGA has made under its current leadership. 

For the sake of clarity, Barrister Sly Ezeokenwa remains the duly elected National Chairman of APGA as no Court of law has nullified his chairmanship. The tussle between Oye and Edozie Njoku is in the past and the tenure in issue has expired since over a year ago. It is a big joke that INEC after more than a year of expiration of that 2019-2023 tenure decided to recognise Edozie Njoku as National Chairman of APGA.

We wish to assure our great party faithfuls and indeed the general public to remain calm as we will surely soar through this latest obstacle. We call on the Independent National Electoral Commission to reverse this obnoxious decision in the interest of justice. APGA should not be made to suffer the greed of selfish and desperate politicians. With God on our side, we will surely overcome. Thanks immensely and God bless you. 

By Mazi Ejimofor Opara KSM, National Publicity Secretary, APGA. 

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Shell must be held accountable for their unmitigated destruction of Nigeria’s coastal land and riverines after 65 years of sojourn in Nigeria.

1

Shell, a multinational oil company, has been a dominant player in Nigeria’s oil industry for the past 65 years. Despite its significant contributions to the country’s economy, Shell must be held accountable for the unmitigated destruction of Nigeria’s coastal land and riverine due to its operations. This issue has been extensively documented in numerous reports, both local and international, highlighting the devastating impact of Shell’s activities on the environment and local communities within the Bayelsa, Rivers, and Delta States of Nigeria.

The damage caused by Shell’s operations in Nigeria is evident in the destruction of vegetation, sea animals, and fish along the creeks and canals in the affected areas. The oil spills and leaks resulting from Shell’s activities have contaminated water sources, destroyed habitats, and disrupted the delicate ecological balance of the region. This has had a profound impact on the livelihoods of local communities who rely on these resources for their sustenance and economic well-being.

Furthermore, the environmental degradation caused by Shell has also had far-reaching consequences on the health and well-being of the people living in the affected areas. The toxic pollutants released into the environment as a result of Shell’s operations have been linked to various health problems, including respiratory issues, skin conditions, and other serious ailments. The lack of clean water sources and the contamination of food supplies have further exacerbated the health risks the local population faces.

In addition to the environmental and health impacts, Shell’s activities have led to social unrest and conflict in the region. The exploitation of natural resources by multinational corporations like Shell has often resulted in heightened tensions between indigenous communities and the government, leading to protests, violence, and displacement of populations. The lack of consultation and consent from local communities in decision-making processes related to oil extraction has further exacerbated these social tensions.

Shell must be held accountable for the environmental devastation and social harm it has caused in Nigeria over the past 65 years. The company must take responsibility for its actions and work towards mitigating the damage done to the coastal land and riverines in the affected areas. This includes implementing measures to prevent future oil spills, cleaning up contaminated sites, compensating affected communities for their losses, and engaging in transparent and collaborative efforts with local stakeholders to restore and protect the environment.

Now that Shell plans to sell off its assets and move offshore, possibly out of Nigeria, its unmitigated destruction of Nigeria’s coastal land and rivers is a stark reminder of the urgent need for accountability and responsible corporate behaviour in the oil industry. The Federal Government of Nigeria should hold them accountable and make them clean up the environmental mess they are leaving behind, as well as make them pay for all the harm done to the land.

The company’s long history of environmental degradation and social harm in Nigeria should serve as a wake-up call for prioritising sustainability, community engagement, and environmental protection in all industrial activities. Shell and other multinational corporations operating in similar contexts must take concrete steps to rectify the damage done and uphold their commitment to the well-being of the environment and local communities.

@NzeIkayMedia

Disclaimer: 

The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

STATE HOUSE PRESS RELEASE!

2
President Tinubu and Vice president Shettima Of Nigeria
President Tinubu and Vice president Shettima Of Nigeria

PRESIDENT TINUBU INAUGURATES THE PRESIDENTIAL ECONOMIC COORDINATION COUNCIL (PECC), ROLLS OUT MEASURES TO STRENGTHEN THE ECONOMY. 

President Bola Tinubu on Thursday inaugurated the Presidential Economic Coordination Council (PECC) and launched the Economic Stabilization Programme to ensure food security, improved power supply, enhanced social welfare and healthcare, increased energy production, and overall economic transformation. Speaking at the inaugural meeting of the 31-member Council held at the Council Chambers in Abuja, President Tinubu, who chairs the Council, underscored the need for innovative solutions to the country’s economic challenges, noting the importance of public-private partnerships in driving economic reforms. ”We have the challenge of energy security in Nigeria. We need to work together to improve our oil and gas sector and increase electricity generation and distribution throughout the country. ”We are determined to do that with your cooperation, collaboration, and recommendations. As a nation, it is so shameful that we are still generating 4.5GW of electricity. ”We must increase our oil production to two (2) million barrels per day within the next few months and we are determined to remove all entry barriers to investments in the energy sector while enhancing competitiveness,” the President stated.

President Tinubu announced measures to stabilise the economy, enhance job creation, and foster economic security, which will run concurrently with the National Construction and Household Support Programme. The measures under the Economic Stabilization Programme are as follows:

(1) Energy Security: The Energy Security Initiative, which includes power, oil and gas, aims to: – Increase on-grid electricity to be delivered to homes and businesses from about 4.5 gigawatts to 6 gigawatts in six months; – Increase oil production to 2 million barrels per day within the next 12 months; and – Remove barriers to entry for investments into the sector to enhance competitiveness.            

(2) Agriculture and Food Security: Under this plan, the aim is to: – Increase staple crops grown by small-holder farmers from 127 million MT in 2023 to 135 million MT this year; – Bolster production by partnering with larger-scale commercial farmers; – Support qualified farmers with satellite imagery for land use planning, crop rotation, and monitoring of agricultural expansion.

(3) Health and Social Welfare: In the health and social welfare sector, the federal government shall: – Make essential medicines available at a lower cost for 80-90 million Nigerians; – Expand healthcare insurance coverage for 1 million vulnerable people via a Vulnerable Group Fund in collaboration with state governments: – Redeploy 20,000 healthcare workers to provide services to 10-12 million patients in areas where they are most urgently needed: – Power up 4,800 primary healthcare centres (PHCs), second tier, and third tier hospitals using renewable energy sources.

(4) Fiscal Measures: Some of the interventions to improve access to finance for the housing sector, MSMEs, and the manufacturing sector are: – Youth-owned enterprises: Support for new and existing youth-owned enterprises across all 36 states of the Federation, creating 7,400 MSMEs within the next 6-12 months: – MSME support: A six hundred and fifty billion naira (N650 billion) facility will provide lower-cost short-term facilities to youth-owned businesses, manufacturers and MSMEs across various industries; food processing, pharmaceutical, agriculture, and wholesale and retail trade. This financing will be based on their current and future receivables, company rating, and market demand for products: – A Manufacturing Stabilization Fund will rejuvenate up to two hundred and fifty companies and deliver lower cost (9.0%-11.0%) long-term facilities to large, medium-scale, and light manufacturers that produce finished goods for domestic and export markets: – Sub-national Matching Fund: A Grow Nigeria Development Fund consisting of a single-digit interest rate loan portfolio with the Bank of Industry and a matching fund agreement with sub-national governments to grow MSMEs: – Expanding the Bank of Industry’s Rural Development Programme: – A fund to support rural economies in developing 300 new MSMEs for each state, including the Federal Capital Territory (Abuja), resulting in 11,100 new rural-based MSMEs across the Federation: – Mortgage Finance Acceleration Facility: A facility that delivers affordable housing for all segments impacted by the cost-of-living challenge. This will support the construction of an additional 25,000 housing units.

These fiscal measures will improve access to finance for MSMEs and, in the process, create 4.7 million direct and indirect jobs over a six to 12-month period. Emphasizing the significance of the task ahead, Vice-President Kashim Shettima, Vice-Chairman of the Council, stated that President Tinubu is committed to proffering solutions to the nation’s economic challenges and not apportioning blame. ”I want to emphasize that when there is a will, there is always a way, and the President does not believe in apportioning blame. He believes in preparing solutions,” the Vice-President said. The Coordinating Minister of the Economy and Minister of Finance, Mr. Wale Edun made a presentation on the highlights of the Accelerated Stabilization and Advancement Plan earlier submitted to the President. The plan details economic issues to be resolved in 2024 by sub-committees in the key sectors of agriculture and food security, energy (oil, gas, power), health and social welfare, and business support. 

Other members of the Council include the Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chairman of the Nigeria Governors Forum, twelve ministers, and the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria. Members from the Organized Private sector include Alhaji Aliko Dangote; Mr. Tony Elumelu; Alhaji Abdul Samad Rabiu; Ms. Amina Maina, Mr. Segun Ajayi-Kadir; Dr. Funke Opeke; Dr. Doyin Salami; Mr. Patrick Okigbo; Mr. Kola Adesina; Mr. Segun Agbaje; Mr. Chidi Ajaere; Mr. Abdulkadir Aliu; and Mr. Rasheed Sarumi.

Signed: Chief Ajuri Ngelale, Special Adviser to the President (Media & Publicity), July 4, 2024

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

ANIOMA STATE: IS IT A REALITY? By Professor Steve Agwo Okecha 

14
Distinquished Senator Ned Nwoko presented the Anioma State Bill to the Hallowed Chambers
Distinquished Senator Ned Nwoko presented the Anioma State Bill to the Hallowed Chambers

I had said to myself several times, that I would retire from commenting on Ndokwa/Ukwuani issues to avoid being insulted and embarrassed by some shallow thinkers. But, each time I attempted to do so, something always cropped up to halt my retirement. Here, we are at it again!

Whenever some non-Ukwuani people in Delta North discuss gleefully the proposed creation of Anioma State, it is the Ndokwa/Ukwuani land that they are targetting, hopefully, for two reasons: first, the viability of the state based on the oil and gas on our soil; second, the possibility of cashing in on our people’s docility, political short-sightedness, servile and sycophantic disposition – tools for easy manipulation. Somehow, a number of our people [the youths in particular] appear to love the creation of Anioma State out of ignorance, and for political crumbs from their pay masters. They are so myopic that they are unable to listen to the elders. Hunger is a terrible thing! Someone among us said the other day, that we wear red caps; the Ibos wear red caps; so we are all Ibos. What a logic! This means that anyone who wears a red cap is an Ibo; the Kano men who wear red caps are Ibos too; so are the Urhobos, the Ijaws, the Itekiris, the Isokos and the Ibiroms who wear red caps. What a display of ignorance! Another ignoramus asked: Do we prefer Wado to Bia?

What is Anioma? The word was coined not long ago by four people: one professor from Ika; two professors from Aniocha and one rich businessman form Aniocha. No Ukwuani man was involved in the choice and coinage of the term. So, we really have no business with Anioma. It is NOT an ethnic entity – certainly NOT.The Ika professor’s house was directly opposite mine in the staff quarters of the university, where both of us once served. He, it was, who told me the story of the emergence of “Anioma.” I have written volumes about our identity. All I can say here is that we are NOT Ibos, Western Ibos, Delta Ibos, Kwales, Bendel Ibos, Ika Ibos, Kwale Ibos, Ukuales. We are simply Ukwuani people. Our ancestors were energetic, self-respecting people. But today, some of our youths are doing everything to embarrass our land. Ndokwa/Ukwuani region is now a breeding ground for: Half-baked journalists, Pseudo-historians, PAs, PPAs, SAs, SSAs, Blackmailers, Professional praise singers, Betrayers, People that symbolise dishonesty, treachery, inconstancy and disloyalty.

An Ukwuani man, in an attempt to convince us that we are Ibos, said that Senator Ifeanyi Okowa has claimed that he is Ibo. So what? How is that our business? That is his personal opinion. So if Okowa [an Ika man, from Owa Alero] says he is an Ibo man, Ukwuani people must, therefore, be Ibos? Those who reason that way should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves, and should have their mental condition thoroughly examined.Sunday Oliseh, whose paternal grandfather was once the Okpala – Uku of Ebedei, says up till now, that he is an Abavo man. Have the heavens fallen? The agitation for Anioma State did not start today. The late Asagba of Asaba [Professor Chike Edozien of blessed memory] played a significant role. So, no single person today can claim the credit. Yes, no one can claim the credit today. I am really disturbed. What is the need for the creation of more states in Nigeria, whereas about 73% of the ones in existence are clearly NOT viable. Many states are unable to pay the minimum wage of N30,000. People are clamouring for more states because the main source of food and power in this country is politics. The position of Ndokwa/Ukwuani Federal Constituency on Anioma State creation has been carefully and ably articulated by the NNU under the leadership of General Mike Ndubisi. That is our collective stand. The agitation of some people [in and outside our land] for the inclusion of the proposed Anioma State in the Southeast geopolitical zone is an ABERRATION. People may have individual inclinations, but, we have, as guided by the NNU, decided to team up with our fellow constituents of the defunct Delta Province. We share many cultural affinities, which I shall enumerate later in this discourse.

I do not believe in state creation in Nigeria, for now. But, if any state is to be created for Delta North, it should bear a completely different name; its capital should be OBIARUKU [a fast growing city] or KWALE [a hub for several oil companies]. No more, no less. Personally, I detest the term “Anioma.” I have never used the word [I prefer Delta North] in my writings or in my public utterances. And of course, Anioma State in NOT my cup of tea. I have read what one of us said on one platform: Ibos marry our girls, and our people marry theirs, and so we can be together. This is bunkum. Haven’t our men and women married Ijaws, Itekiris, Ikas, Ibibios, Nupes, Hausas, Idomas, Tivs, Ibiroms Igalas, Yorubas, and even non-Nigerians? We need to be more serious; this is not a joking matter. Some of our names, some of our words are similar to those of the Ibos. This does not make us Ibos or make the Ibos Ukwuani. We are completely different groups of people. The Igarras of Edo North and the Egbiras of Okenne in Kogi State, speak EXACTLY the same language. But they claim TWO different ethnic groups. Obi is a name borne by people in Iboland, Ukwuaniland, Isokoland, Idomaland, Aniochaland, Edo North, and other places. This does not mean that these places have any cultural or linguistic similarities. German is the official language of Austria, but Austrians are NOT Germans. Many of us in Ukwuaniland bear foreign names: John, James, Johnson, Victoria, Evelyn, Patricia, Samuel, Dennis, Christopher, Paul, George, Helen, and many, many more. Can we now claim to be British?

I wish to proudly say that we have many incontestable typical Ukwuani names, such as: Uligi, Ubege, Etigwam, Otunuya, Oliseyenum, Chimkwanum, Anamali, Ochonogor, Ishiekwene, Animam, Ogbolu, Nwose, Oshamisu, and many more. One way to preserve our identity is to give our children typical Ukwuani names.The Dein of Agbor has recently ordered his subjects to now give typical Agbor, non-Ibo-sounding names to their children. And I salute him. We have more to do in common with our fellow Deltans than with the Ibos. We have interacted [and are interacting] more with fellow Deltans than with the Ibos. We and other Deltans respect elders; this is not quite the case with the Ibos. The Ibos are too opinionated and dogmatic. Deltans are not so.The Ibos worship money, and can do anything and everything to get money. We are not so.

Our people dress like other Deltans. Women: George wrappers, blouses, headties, trinkets. Men: Wrappers, bowler hats, with walking sticks to match. Food: Before hunger nationalised akpu [mpiko], Deltans ate [and still eat]: yam, plantain, starch, owo [ofune], banga [ofeku], fish. Marriage: Similar customs among Deltan communities. Those of the Ibos are different from ours. Dance: We all in Delta dance still dance [ekeneke].Burial rites: Similar burial rites in Delta State. We all do second burial. Ibo burial rites are different. Adultery: All Deltans [including our people] consider adultery as a very serious crime. The culprits [men and women] are thoroughly punished; rituals are performed for cleansing, and to appease the gods. The Ibos appear to be rather carefree. Their gods appear never to be in the mood to punish adulterers. Welcoming spirit: Deltans anywhere they live are more open and welcoming than the Ibos.

My brothers and sisters, do you really know the Ibos and their ways? They are self-eliminating; they go to any lengths to destroy even their kinsmen for money. Have you done any business with an Ibo man? If he did not cheat you, then God was on your side. I love the Ibos for their energy and industry, but I’ll hesitate to be in the same geopolitical zone with them. Our people cannot cope with their intrigues. 

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Tinubu’s ‘taste’ gerontocracy By Lasisi Olagunju 

3
President Tinubu and 85 year-old Chief Bisi Akande he appointed Pro-chancellor, and Council Chairman, University of Ibadan
President Tinubu and 85 year-old Chief Bisi Akande he appointed Pro-chancellor, and Council Chairman, University of Ibadan

The University of Ibadan is 75 years old. Chief Bisi Akande celebrated his 85th birthday on January 16 this year. He was made Secretary to Oyo State Government 45 years ago at the age of 40. He was Deputy Governor of Oyo State 42 years ago. He was elected Osun State Governor in 1999 – 25 years ago. He left the office of governor 21 years ago. Last Friday, the 85-year-old man was appointed by President Bola Tinubu to serve the University of Ibadan as its pro-chancellor and chairman of the council. When you heard Chief Akande’s name as the appointee, you were almost as sure as I was that the old warrior would reject it in a jiffy. I told myself that he would tell his friend, the president, that his choice for UI’s top job must be an error; that only today’s hound can successfully chase today’s hare. But today is Monday – four days after, Chief Bisi Akande has not rejected the ‘juicy’ job. We have no business rejecting it for him.

An elephant chooses how he wants the forest to address him. If you schooled at the same time as I did, you must have read the poem ‘Salute to the Elephant’. It is there that you meet Elephant – “possessor of a savings-basket full of money” who is “huge as a hill, even in a crouching posture.” The Elephant is that mighty one “who carries mortar and yet walks with a swaggering gait…, animal treading ponderously.” The Elephant, more importantly, is that “mountainous animal, (the) huge beast who tears a man like a garment and hangs him up on a tree.” The sight of the Elephant, the chanter-hunter says, “causes people to stampede towards a hill of safety.” Now, imagine that elephant coming down from the height of his high reputation to mingle with deers in a scavenge rush for forbs. An elephant would do that if it does not see itself as an elephant. It is his choice. I am not qualified to tell this chief’s elephant not to eat what common goats eat. But if I were his son, I would beg him to say “No, thank you.”

Chief Akande is not alone on that geriatric podium of self-diminution. With him is General Ike Omar Sanda Nwachukwu (Rtd) who was made chairman of the University of Nigeria governing council. The University of Nigeria is 69 years old. It was founded in 1955 but formally opened on October 7, 1960. General Nwachukwu will be 84 years old on September 1, this year. He has been everything anyone would ever want to be in Nigeria. As a soldier, he rose to be Major-General and General Officer Commanding. He was governor of Imo State 40 years ago. He was Minister of Labour 39 years ago. He was Foreign Affairs Minister 34 years ago. He was elected senator 25 years ago. He is back from the bench in this season of renewed past.

Must it be them? Don’t they have around them, in their political party, sleek-headed younger people with knowledge and ideas who can handle these assignments? They have them, but those ones are useful only as aides and as bag carriers.

Writing in May last year for the US’ satire newspaper, The Onion, grand old Dianne Feinstein satirized America as “an out-of-touch gerontocracy” where “the average age of a senator is 65” – and the president eighty-something years old. She said she was “glad” not to live and get stuck in that country of “dementia-addled” leaders “who keep a stranglehold on power” and “who prioritise their own careers and bank accounts over the common good.” Then she wondered, angrily “How selfish you’d have to be to cling to power when you’ve long since ceased to understand the needs of ordinary people.” I will be shocked if I am the only one who thinks strongly that Feinstein wrote about the Nigeria of today.

I read a sonnet of William Shakespeare where he deplores “age” staying “too long.” In his ‘The Passionate Pilgrim’, Shakespeare explains why “crabbed age and youth cannot live together.” Shakespeare sings, “Youth like summer brave, age like winter bare.” He says “Youth is full of sport, age’s breath is short; Youth is nimble, age is lame; Youth is hot and bold, age is weak and cold; Youth is wild, and age is tame…” Yet, our country’s vote is for the old and cold; the lame, the tame.

We have more of them. Our universities are now a rest home for the ancient. There is also 72-year-old Alhaji Yayale Ahmed who was announced as the chairman of 62-year-old Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. He was appointed Head of Service of the Federation in the year 2000 – 24 years ago. He occupied that post for seven years, retiring in 2007 to be appointed Minister of Defence. He left the office of minister in September 2008 to be appointed as the Secretary to the Government of the Federation. He held sway there till May 2011. He left thirteen years ago. He is back from retirement to preside over ABU’s highest governing body.

These king-size men and others on that long list will be interfacing with a 70-year-old minister. Professor Tahir Mamman is our minister of education. If he had remained in the university system, he would be due for retirement in three weeks. The minister reports to a president who is officially 72 years old. Essentially, these 20th-century men are the drivers of the 21st-century vision of Nigeria’s knowledge industry. That is the way we roll. The National Universities Commission (NUC) regulates Nigeria’s university system. Who is NUC’s substantive executive secretary? Check if it has. And, who presides over its board? As I write this today, Sunday, 16 June 2024, the commission in charge of our universities has on its website, Emeritus Professor Ayo Banjo as the chairman of its board. Baba Professor Banjo died last month – he was 90 years old. NUC has not remembered to update its website to reflect that fact – or it is reluctant to let go of the late Professor Banjo. 

Beyond the dead, shall we ask the new octogenarian appointees where they hope to start in this digital age? With their appointments, Nigeria is asking its Gen Z students to use the fatigued eyes of tired men to prepare for their journey into the future. May God help them.

A leader must know when to say enough to seek power. Someone (I can’t get their name) said knowing when to walk away is wisdom. He also said being able to walk away is courage. Yet, there is a third line: walking away with your head held high is dignity. Why would an eighty-something-year-old man want to be a baggage carrier – porter – to the youth of his land? Someone said it is the love of service. I replied that it is simply a case of an Egungun, because of perks, dancing itself into irrelevance.

Apart from them being his friends, are there patriotic reasons why the president posted these men to those schools? We may not know the real reason why our president made those geriatric choices – unless he tells us. Raul Magni Berton and Sophie Panel in 2017 did a paper on why non-democratic systems produce older leaders. They postulate that leaders’ “ruling styles” are “partly shaped by the rules that brought them to power.” They ask why anyone, even the old, would want to be ruled by aged people. They dissect the types and motives of gerontocratic rule. They say “the selection of ageing leaders based on premeditated considerations” is the definition of strategic gerontocracy. They contrast this with what they call ‘taste’ gerontocracy “which is based on genuine preference for old leaders”. They speak on ‘skills’ gerontocracy which assumes that the chosen had “specific skills acquired with age.” What special skills do our eighty-something-year-old ‘chairmen’ have that recommended them for our universities as pro-chancellors? Tinubu is not known to be a wine connoisseur who flaunts the old as the better. So, I wonder why the president loves old stuff – old, fossilized national anthem and aged administrators.

This government’s choice of yesterday’s men for today’s work has natural consequences. You know menopause, its complications and implications. That is what the University of Ibadan, UNN, ABU and some others in their geriatric shoes are now married to. Escaping the schools’ climacteric suitors and their creaky beds looks futile. When Humphrey Hawksley wrote his 2009 book, ‘Democracy Kills’, he probably had our case in mind. There is hardly anything which today’s democracy inherited that it has not fed to the dogs. While we fantasised about what the textbook says democracy is, the leaders have unitised the benefits in it; they’ve warehoused the gains in their family silos – for the comfort of their generations and for their friends.

I am wasting my time writing this. The same applies to you raising complaints about our planes being run aground. The government does not care about the public and its opinion. You can’t blame it. There is a problem with winning all bouts all the time. It intoxicates the winner, making them look down on the street and disdainful of even their fans. “At being humble, I’m the greatest”. A Minnesota, United States mother in about 1970, was horrified to hear her young wrestler-son say this as he recorded wins after wins. The woman described that statement of her son as “silly” – but that was hubris at work. We read such ‘humility’ in the insults the Nigerian leadership rolls out almost daily. Everything points at the end of sanity in the conduct of our affairs. Yet, long before this present darkness, there had been eras of rationality and hope. There had been an age when leaders insulted not the people’s sensitivities and the people bowed in respect of fair leadership. We had a past of values which even those who colonised us acknowledged in their own moments of sobriety.

Between the last days of 1927 and the early weeks of 1928, a group of United Kingdom’s Members of Parliament visited Nigeria. They moved from the coasts in Lagos through the hinterland forests to the grasslands of the North. They thoroughly toured the East of Nigeria and the creeks of the Niger Delta – then went back to London through Lagos. At a dinner of the African Society in London on 13 March 1928, the leader of the delegation, Major Walter Eliot, presented his team’s report. In that report, Major Eliot said while in Nigeria, his team saw an “honest attempt” by the black man to build “a house” for his soul; a house “where the black man could find a shelter” against the impact of a strange alien culture; a house “from which in years to come, he may take his own share as a partner in the progress of the world – not as an inferior and certainly not as a serf…” Eliot’s optimism – expressed in that report 96 years ago – was hasty and misplaced. If the Briton visits Nigeria of today, he will meet 200 million people shuffling and struggling (not) to be serfs of power.

That is not all from Eliot. Everywhere they went, his team said they saw people who had very high regard for their leaders and who had their leaders’ respect. He disclosed that his team members were surprised (and impressed) and believed that “the black man should look to the black ruler as the keystone in the arch of rule; that the white man should not be the keystone…that the rule should be of the black man by the black man and – as far as we can devise it – for the black man.”

They are long dead, those proud, upright people who were met in Nigeria by the British in 1927. About a hundred years after the Eliot team experience and the positive testimony from London, and 64 years after foreign rule, a virulent strain of disdain for the ruled – and disgust for the ruler – reigns. Our democracy is a despicable bazaar; the classic “every man for himself and God for us all.” What the 1927/28 visitors envisioned as the rule “of the black man by the black man” has turned out not “for the black man.” The rule serves the strongman and his clan whose ways are decidedly not necessarily the ways of their people.

They take the benefits; their children take. Their concubines and mistresses also pick theirs while your own portion is tucked away in their pouch. It is the reason they can’t reason with us when we say Nigeria cannot survive as a unitary presidentialism. They take our call for federalist sanity as a threat to the advantages they enjoy. They think a truly federal Nigeria would be too tight to structure into personal fiefdoms. They work that federalism won’t happen. Not now, not tomorrow. And they are winning. They spring on us federal surprises everywhere. They set up institutions and make appointments that are designed to unitarise our lives under Big Brother. Because they are smart, they easily know that they can’t compete and feed their greed in a Nigeria that is properly structured. The result of their knowing is that we can’t breathe without their permission.

A restructured Nigeria has the prospect of not surrendering to Comrade Napoleon’s unitary dictatorship in Animal Farm. Less than one week into this democracy, Professor Bolaji Akinyemi, in the Friday, 4 June 1999 edition of the Nigerian Tribune, warned that Nigeria was on the way to a most destructive form of unitarism. “The road to the hell of unitarism is paved with good intentions. They should be careful…”, he warned the inheritors of the gains of the struggle for this democracy. They ignored him. We were too hopeful to hear him. But, the words of elders, if they don’t come true in the morning, they will in the evening. The evening of Nigeria is here. 

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

PRESS RELEASE BY IPOB 12th June,2024.

2
London, July 2023, IPOB members demanding the release of their leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu
London, July 2023, IPOB members demanding the release of their leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu

DISLODGED FULANI KIDNAPPERS AT LOKPANTA CARRIED OUT ATTACK ON THE SOLDIERS AT ABA IN CONNIVANCE WITH ARMY AUTHORITY IN ABIA STATE – IPOB

The Noble family and movement of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) ably led by the great leader, Mazi Nnamdi Okwuchukwu Kanu wish to let the public know that aggrieved Fulani terrorist kidnapping traders at Lokpanta in connivance with some Fulanis  in the military authority in Abia State were responsible for the attack and murder of 4 Igbo Soldiers in Aba on May 30th, Biafra Heroes Day. The attack was masterminded to blackmail IPOB and to attack the government of Dr. Alex Otti of Abia State.

The Nigerian government and her murderous Army falsely and hastily accused IPOB as responsible for the attack on Nigeria soldiers in Aba on May 30th, 2024, during the Biafra Heroes Day. IPOB denied the allegations and called for an investigation into the murder of the soldiers. Instead of carrying out an investigation, the Nigerian Government and Nigerian Army resulted in media blackmail against IPOB because it was a premeditated plan to blackmail IPOB and Governor Otti, the executive governor of Abia State. 

However, IPOB’s Intelligence unit (the M.Branch) went uncover among the Fulani traders to unravel the murderers of the soldiers on Biafra Heroes Day. The result of our findings was that the attackers were Fulani militias. It was discovered that some of the aggrieved Fulani kidnappers masquerading as cattle traders at the Lokpanta cattle market in connivance with the Fulani military hierarchy in Abia State launched the attack and murdered Nigerian soldiers to blackmail IPOB and to create confusion in the government of Governor Alex Otti for dislodging their criminal hideouts at Lokpanta cattle market. 

IPOB intelligence unit, M-Branch gathered that the Fulani criminals and kidnappers who were using Lokpanta market as a hideout were shut out of the market by Gov. Alex Otti’s demolition of the shanties and brothels inside the Lokpanta market has been looking for means to create chaos in Abia State. The call by IPOB for a sit-at-home on 30th May to honor Biafrans Heroes provided an opportunity for them to launch an attack on Abia State. 

The Obikabia military checkpoint was marked as the point to attack. They colluded with their  brothers in the Nigeria Army in Abia State, who posted only the Igbo soldiers and Christian soldiers from Plateau State to the Obikabia military checkpoint to be used as sacrificial lambs. The plan was to murder the Igbo and Christian soldiers to create division among Ndigbo.

That was the reason the Nigerian media were told to highlight that the murdered soldiers were Igbos. Nigeria media hardly attached the ethnicity or religion to the slain soldiers in the North, the army deployed only Igbo soldiers and  few Christian soldiers to duty post on that day because they had a secret mission to slaughter  their fellow soldiers who are Igbo and a few Christian soldiers. They didn’t believe that this information would come to public notice. The murder of the soldiers in Aba was planned and meditated to demonise IPOB. The media propaganda strategy was put in place to ensure they create confusion among Ndigbo and the IPOB movement, but they didn’t know that would fail. That is why the Nigerian Army accused IPOB of being responsible within hours of the attack. The next day, the Nigerian media named the slain soldiers as Igbo soldiers. The next day, the Nigerian President also issued a genocidal and wicked statement against IPOB and Ndigbo comparing what happened to Okuama Community in Delta State incident as child’s play to what is going to happen in Abia State. It was a well coordinated plan to blackmail IPOB and to set the stage for military invasion of Abia State Government. The M-Branch intelligence unit also revealed that Miyetti Allah terrorist groups and Fulani jihadists are planning a second attack any moment from now, and they will mention IPOB-ESN to demonise us. 

The aggrieved Fulani kidnappers shut out from the Lokpanta market want to bring harm to Governor Alex Otti’s government in Abia State, and their collaborators in the Nigerian Army are not happy with Governor Otti and his Government as well. They want to destabilize and create chaos in Abia State. Dr. Alex Otti must be very careful and watchful. 

The aggrieved Fulani terrorists and their jihadist soldiers have vowed to make Abia State ungovernable for Dr Alex Otti. Those of them in the Nigerian Army are under pressure to attack Abia civilians in retaliation of the false flag operation of 30th May. These Fulani terrorists have received funding from Miyetti Allah to mobilize and send some terrorists into Abia State if their friends in the Nigerian Army refuse to slaughter Abia residents and create confusion. Miyetti Allah terrorist organization funds most of the kidnapping and criminalities in the South East.

IPOB-ESN is waiting for the Miyetti Allah imported terrorists in Igboland. Though, the Fulani terrorist masquerading as herdsmen are enjoying the protection of the Nigeria Army. Nevertheless, IPOB-ESN will never allow them to turn South East into a war zone like they did in the North.

IPOB, however, cautions Governor Alex Otti not to capitulate under pressure to allow traders to reside inside the Lokpanta market. Since  the shanties at the Lokpanta market were demolished, the crime rate and kidnapping cases along the Lokpanta axis have been drastically reduced. IPOB advocates for the total shutdown of the Lokpanta cattle market. If not to completely reform it, allowing only the legitimate traders in the market, and not criminals, terrorists and kidnappers.

IPOB remains a non-violent freedom fighting movement. All false flag operations that the Nigerian government and her murderous Security Forces have adopted in murdering innocent policemen, soldiers, and civilians to blackmail IPOB have failed and will continue to fail. 

COMRADE EMMA POWERFUL, MEDIA, AND PUBLICITY SECRETARY FOR IPOB. #FreeMaziNnamdiKanuNow #Biafra #IPOB #ESN #BiafraReferendumNow

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

Prof Sam Ojukwu Passes on to Glory! – He Was a Consequential and Game-Changing Musical Icon in Nigeria By Alfred Obiora Uzokwe.

10
Prof Sam Ojukwu Passes on to Glory!
Prof Sam Ojukwu Passes on to Glory!

It was early 1968. The Nigerian civil war was raging! I did not know who he was until I listened to his choral group – the St Mary’s choir, Uruagu Nnewi, render several melodious numbers in the main bowl of the then St Mary’s church. He was the choir master, he was the music conductor, he was the pianist. He was stylish in his displays, fleet-footedly roving and prancing magnificently from his spot in front of the choir to the piano. He had a unique and stylish choir conducting movements, moving his hands, arms and at times seemingly trying to elongate his gait so that those standing at the back of the choral formation would be seeing him without obstruction.  I was about 8 years of age but was always mesmerized. 

At the time and as a little boy, I did not quite have a deep sense of music appreciation.  But I fell in love with the awe-inspiring displays of Sam Ojukwu as the choir master and my love for music, which waxes strong till this day,  began to take shape.

At home, sometimes, in a small building inside our compound we called Ozobi, while singing St Mary’s choir songs, I would stand in front of an imaginary choir, as a conductor, trying to imitate the moves of a man that had become my music idol.

Time passed and the war raged on. Then the opportunity came. I was given the opportunity, along with some other kids, to become part of child dancers to a French song that Sam Ojukwu had taught the St Mary’s Choir. It was called “L’amour est aveugle”.  It means-“Love is Blind”. My childhood friend, Ubaka, who was Sam Ojukwu’s nephew and his niece, Ida Ojukwu, Nnamdi Unigwe, Humphrey Enuma, Chiemeka Ileka, my cousins Charles and Obiageli Edozien, were all part of the child dancing troupe. 

We went with the St Mary’s choir everywhere they were to perform, including perform for Biafra wounded soldiers.  The song was always the grand finale after the choir had rendered all their songs, usually to the delight of the audience. Sam Ojukwu would usually stand in front of the choir and announce, “the next and final music performance is: “L’amour est aveugle”.  I will be honest, since I did not know a word of French then, it always sounded to me like he said, “Lamo a dey guanzo”. We would file into the center of the stage and he would give the note on the piano.  The St Mary’s choir would begin the song, swaying from side to side and we would start dancing in rhythmic and pantomimic fashion as taught. It was always a delight to the audience. 

Sam composed, taught the choir and they sang various songs of comfort and morale boost to Biafra and Biafrans during the war. 

At the end of the war, he went back to the school where he was teaching before the war started. But he still found time to periodically come back to St Mary’s choir to teach and conduct. He had a deputy choir master – Raymond Chukwuma.

In 1971 or there about, Archbishop C.J. Patterson, who was the English Bishop on the Niger in 1945 and who established the famous All Saints Cathedral Onitsha in 1949, visited St Mary’s Church. It was a big deal in all of the Anglican diocese in and around Onitsha! Many important church dignitaries attended the church service that was held in the missionary’s honor. That was the year I was confirmed to receive holy Communion.  

For weeks, before the event, the St Mary’s choir practiced a song that was composed by Sam Ojukwu in the archbishop’s honor. I remember the song like yesterday, but what I could not understand then was why the song was composed in Igbo language since the archbishop was an English man. But as usual, during the church ceremony, when the song was rendered by the choir with Sam Ojukwu as composer and conductor, the church erupted in applause and appreciation. 

Sam Ojukwu’s influence was not just around St Mary’s Church Nnewi.  He later became a music and French professor in Alvan Ikoku College of Education Owerri. Here, he turned so many people from students to music experts.  He composed hundreds of songs and sometimes just gave away the song to churches, schools all over Nigeria to use as they saw fit. His name is imprinted onto so many songs all over Nigeria as composer.

A notable event took place at the government house in Owerri when Governor Sam Mbakwe was at the helm in Imo State, (1979 to 1983).   Sam Ojukwu and his choral group presented a song he composed to the dignitaries in attendance.  The governor was so enamored by the classic performance that there and then, he promoted him by moving him from his salary grade to a higher salary grade in school. 

In my book Surviving in Biafra, there are multiple chapters where Sam Ojukwu, as the choir master of St Mary’s church, featured. In 2005 or there about, during a visit to Nigeria, along with my younger brother, Nnamdi, I took a hard back copy of my book, autographed it to Professor Sam Ojukwu. I was going to hand off the book to him after church service at St Marys. But my younger brother, Nnamdi, rightly pointed out that it was not something to be done in secret. He took to the microphone in full view of the congregation, and with the book in hand, called up and handed the book to Sam Ojukwu. My brother emphasized that he featured in many chapters of the book and was my music idol. He was very grateful.

When my mother passed away and during her burial service, the music impresario led his choral group and again rendered a melodious tune he composed in my mother’s honor. He capped it with a soul-melting rendition of Hallelujah chorus. 

Music is a universal language. It is hard to run into someone who does not love one type of music or another. Professor Sam Ojukwu stammered a little bit but did not let it stop him. He used his music to speak to the heart, the soul and the mind of anyone within and outside his sphere of influence. In Biafra, he used it to comfort our souls and cheer us all up as starvation, privation and disease decimated the population. After the war, he continued to use music to delight many and impart his music expertise to many. He was my music mentor, but he did not know it until told.

He has run his race. He has done well. Sir, may your soul rest in peace.  You have done well. You should be celebrated for your legacy will live for long. Good Night Professor, Sir Samuel Ojukwu

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.

RENEWED SUFFERING By Fr Pat Amobi Chukwuma

2
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of Nigeria
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of Nigeria

Indeed a toad does not run in the day time for nothing. Also there is no smoke without fire. I was sitting outside minded in my office few days ago. In other words my body was present there while my spirit was roaming about due to the distressful condition in Nigeria today. Suddenly, I heard an uncomfortable knock on my office door. I shouted, “Who is that!?” A restless unfamiliar female voice shouted, “I am an uncomfortable child of God and a hopeless citizen of Nigeria!” I asked her to come in. She walked in like a semi ghost. I offered her a seat, but she rejected. She said she preferred to stand up so that her request can be granted with dispatch. I asked, “What can I do for you?” She forwarded her baptismal card to me and requested for an instant change of her name from Joy to Job. I laughed over her request. She looked at me mercifully and asserted, “Father, this is not a laughing matter. Kindly erase Joy and replaced it with Job or you issue me a new baptismal card bearing Job.” I glanced at her pitifully and replied, “What is written is written. We do not alter names in our vital church document because it has gone viral, even up to heaven. In addition, Job is commonly a masculine name.” She responded, “Father, it is hot weather that made crayfish to bend. Emergency knows no gender. After all some women are called Michael, Raphael, etc. I have suffered many calamities in this country Nigeria.” To cut it short I referred her to any of the National Newspapers for the change of name. She interjected, “What is said is said. Henceforth my name is Job. The y in Joy is automatically changed to b. I will rewrite it by myself.” She walked out of my office like a mad woman, banging the door. I exclaimed, “God have mercy! Hardship has caused havoc in this country.” 

I quite understand the plight of the distressed lady in the scene described above. Suffering has caused untold physical and mental problems nowadays. We seem to be descending from bad to worse every day. It is hoped that a soul delivered from the fire of purgatory is destined for heaven. Here in Nigeria, we walk from purgatory to hell. The eight years of the administration of former president Buhari is adjudged to set us many years behind. In fact, the labours of our heroes past are getting in vain. 

It is now the turn of President Bola Tinubu to lead us. His manifestoes are summarized in two words: ‘Renewed Hope.’ Every word has an opposite. The opposite of God is Satan. The opposite of Renewed is outdated. The opposite of Hope is hopelessness. The opposite of election is selection. The opposite of winning is rigging. The opposite of justice is injustice. The opposite of fair play is intimidation. The opposite of democracy is autocracy. The opposite of truth is falsehood. The opposite of renewed hope is renewed suffering. These negative opposites are the nucleus of our present predicaments in this country. Indeed they have crippled our weak legs. A crippled man can only work by miracle. Our country Nigeria has been crippled by bad leadership. Our sufferings are man-made. God blessed us with abundant natural and human resources. Mismanagement is our sole problem.

The Renewed Hope Administration on the day of her inauguration instantly removed fuel subsidy without thinking of its side effects. What did we see immediately? The prices of essential commodities galloped from bottom to top. Drivers and car owners cried for help due to the exorbitant cost of the motor spirit known as fuel. My neighbor who is a civil servant packed his car and resorted to trekking reasonable distances. Also he resorted to taking his four kids to school on a wheel barrow. Thus school run can be done by any means, so far the pupils are punctual at school.

The careless removal of fuel subsidy caused more harm than good. Its worst effect is acute hunger in the land. Nigerians are hungry. My people believe that a hopeful hunger is not dangerous because food is on the way. On the contrary we are experiencing unhopeful hunger because food is not in sight. Our tables are empty. Even ordinary drinking water is exorbitant. Some people have resorted to drinking urine which, they say, is medicinal. A hungry person is an angry person. High blood pressure is now on the increase due to this anger syndrome. Most common citizens have now double facial appearances of hunger and anger. Asking a hungry and angry man to be merely hopeful is suicidal. Medicine after death is useless. A corpse has no more appetite. Recently some villagers somewhere buried a wretched man who died of hunger with a bag of rice and seven tubers of yam, so that he will not be hungry again in the land of the dead. What a nonsensical nonsense! It is better to pay condolence to a hungry person with food items when the person is still alive. It is foolish to give a befitting burial to a person who died of hunger. I reiterate that befitting living is the best. What is the essence of giving the dead a befitting burial when he or she lived an unbefitting life?

The renewed suffering is evident in the worsening insecurity in the country. The late Head of State, General Sani Abacha, said that government is culpable in any insecurity that lasted more than six months. The former President Goodluck Jonathan lamented that Boko Haram supporters were in his government. The federal government of Tinubu of recent named the sponsors of insecurity in the country. Have they been arrested and persecuted? Until the rotten tooth is identified and pulled out, the mouth must chew with caution. Is it true that some ‘repentant’ terrorists were recruited into the Army and Police? A mad man can be cured of his madness but his murmuring remains. The repentance of a hardened criminal is doubtful. Who are the informants of terrorists and kidnappers? It is the rat at home that told the wild rat that there is fish in the basket at home. Therefore the federal and state governments must look inwards to curb the acute insecurity in this country today. Nearly all Nigerians are sleeping with two eyes opened every night.

The worsening condition of a sick person can lead to coma. The renewed suffering in the country is escalating. The power supply outage experienced presently all over the nation is alarming. The federal government removed electricity subsidy without adequate consultation and increased electricity tariff as well. These have done more harm than good. Power blackout is the order of the day. For almost three weeks now in my area, we are living in acute darkness. Hence the agents of darkness are on the increase. The ‘Renewed Hope’ administration should have ensured constant power supply. Instead we experience renewed suffering of total power failure nationwide. The darkness that God expelled during his creative activity has found an abode in Nigeria. Many people have resorted to use of local oil lamps and charcoal iron.

The acute power failure has added energy in the current heat wave. The inordinate pollution of our environment has made nature to revolt violently. The high and hot temperature has caused uncountable human havoc. Many people now sleep outside due to heat wave. The fans and air conditioners remain dormant due to lack of electricity. Thus the people battle with mosquitoes whose bites cause malaria. Most often nowadays the wind has ceased to blow. A certain man who slept naked outside due to excessive heat had his manhood devoured by a dangerous snake called ‘echieteka.’ He was rushed to the intensive unit of a teaching hospital for plastic surgery with chance of survival put at 50 – 50. From all indications, the solution to our renewed suffering is not in sight. Divine intervention is our only hope. O God, where are you?

Disclaimer: 

The opinions and views expressed in this write-up are entirely those of the Writer(s). They do not reflect the opinions and views of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or any of its employees. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the Publisher (Nze Ikay Media) or its employees concerning the legal status of any country, its authority, area or territory or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Equally, the sketches, images, pictures and videos are gotten from the public domain.